User talk:Johnello

Welcome!

Hello, Johnello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Red Director 18:09, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion

I see you added the deletion notification to the articles for deletion page. You are supposed to put that on the talk page of the user who created the article. It's not really a problem, just the user didn't get any warning that the article they created could be deleted. If you have any more questions feel free to ask. James086Talk 08:49, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Janus I, Duke of Masovia.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Janus I, Duke of Masovia.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:10, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Adelajda Kujawska.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Adelajda Kujawska.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:04, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Adelajda Kujawska

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Adelajda Kujawska, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Propaniac 18:10, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Henriette Renard

Hi Johnello, I see your article about Henriette Renard are you sure about all the names? why delete your second surname Duval? the name of the father es Pierre or Andrew? it was really a wine merchant as two wikipedia article suggets? I appreciate your response. Aldebaran69 18:40, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Jean-Paul Gourges

A tag has been placed on Jean-Paul Gourges requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Icestorm815 (talk) 20:42, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Elisabeth Moritz

A tag has been placed on Elisabeth Moritz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ravenswing 07:42, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Samuil Skavronsky

A tag has been placed on Samuil Skavronsky requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ravenswing 07:43, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Serge Victorovich Spetschinsky

A tag has been placed on Serge Victorovich Spetschinsky requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ravenswing 07:46, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Countess Sophie Potocka by Kucharsky.jpg

Your edit to Alexander Kucharsky has drawn my attention to the confusion over this image, which I uploaded to Commons. Is it Countess Sophie Potocka, or Countess Helena Potocka, or even (as Gustav Kobbé claims in The Loves of Great Composers (see here) Countess Delphine Potocka? And who is the artist? I see the uploader of Image:Tonci-Countess Helena Potocka.jpg has got it from Sophie Potocka. How have you arrived at your view, and what is your view, please? Xn4 (talk) 22:12, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Edward Tudor (1536)

A tag has been placed on Edward Tudor (1536), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

no reason given

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Johnello (talk) 08:06, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Maria Anna Katharina Rutowska

Please visit article talk page. A.J. (talk) 12:57, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Brita Persson Karth

Hi! Just a small thing; the title of the article should be changed to Brita Karth or Brita Persdotter Karth. In those days, the name Persson was not really a last name, as it is nowadays; it just ment "Pers son", "Son of Per"; and Brita was a woman, so she would have been Persdotter, "Pers daughter". That's not easy to think of, I know! --85.226.235.160 (talk) 12:29, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Lilian Baels.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Lilian Baels.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 04:02, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Neighbors from hell 3.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Neighbors from hell 3.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 04:58, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Neighbors from Hell 3: In Office

I have nominated Neighbors from Hell 3: In Office, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neighbors from Hell 3: In Office. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Salavat (talk) 14:33, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kardosné

Please expand this article - you haven't told us what century she lived in. Is her town "Debrechen" the same as [{Debrecen]]? And please write in sentences. And give your sources. Thanks. PamD (talk) 18:59, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Online genealogy websites

Please do not create articles about medieval nobility based on online databases of genealogical data. They are notoriously unreliable. Unless you have solid scholarly sources and can double-check the databases, please do not create new articles. For example, Ivan and Yuri of Lithuania never existed. It is a historical hoax introduced by an unreliable medieval chronicle. Renata (talk) 18:43, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It sounds strange?

Hello, Johnello! You cannot move pages just because their titles sound strange to you and you certainly can't change facts just because you think they're strange. The wife of HRH Prince Alexander of Belgium is known as HRH Princess Alexander of Belgium, just like the wife of HRH Prince Michael of Kent is known as HRH Princess Michael of Kent. They use those styles no matter how strange it sounds to you. Surtsicna (talk) 13:09, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Princess Alexander of Belgium is her "name" now (her style to be precise). Her husband is Prince Alexander of Belgium and she is Princess Alexander of Belgium. She is best known as Princess Alexander of Belgium. A simple Google test will confirm this. Surtsicna (talk) 17:39, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Aleksandra von Engelhardt

A tag has been placed on Aleksandra von Engelhardt requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Patchy1Talk To Me! 21:24, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Aleksandra von Engelhardt

I have nominated Aleksandra von Engelhardt, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aleksandra von Engelhardt. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ironholds (talk) 12:32, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Princess of Vasa

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Princess of Vasa. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess of Vasa. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:15, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ryksa

The article Ryksa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

It is probably hoax. There is no sources about Popiel's wife

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Maglocunus (talk) 20:03, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Maria Wiadrowska

A tag has been placed on Maria Wiadrowska requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. —ShadowRanger ^(talk|stalk) 19:44, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Hannah Montana (season 4). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 19:40, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Józef z Kocięcina Kocięcki

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Józef z Kocięcina Kocięcki requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. 80.51.160.42 (talk) 20:30, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Urszula Kochanowska

The article Urszula Kochanowska has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability. Indication that there may have been no such person.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Auntof6 (talk) 13:27, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jean Paul Gourges for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Jean Paul Gourges, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jean Paul Gourges until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 03:17, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Phineas and Ferb (season 3)

TV.com is not a reliable source. It's user submitted. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 20:20, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nikola of Bulgaria

The article Nikola of Bulgaria has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced. Deleted form the Bulgarian Wikipedia for WP:NOR.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:21, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Katalin of Bulgaria

The article Katalin of Bulgaria has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links:
Katalin of Bulgaria – news, books, scholar
Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability. Please see the plain-language summary of our notability guidelines.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DrKiernan (talk) 13:38, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Source

Hello,

which sources did you use to create this article? I am very curious. Best regards Kmicic (talk) 20:53, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Maria Teresa Sobieska for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maria Teresa Sobieska is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maria Teresa Sobieska until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 13:55, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Józef z Kocięcina Kocięcki

The article Józef z Kocięcina Kocięcki has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Seems to fail WP:BIO. Treasurer of a town/district doesn't seem to be enough to make him notable, it was a minor regional office.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 13:57, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

For creating many articles on women. Wikipedia badly needs more such articles. But please pay heed to Wikipedia:Notability (biographies). You may want to join and seek assistance from Wikipedia:WikiProject Women history. Let me know if I can help, --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 14:18, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Niemierza z Gołczy

The article Niemierza z Gołczy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 08:52, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]