User talk:Johndawe

Maryanne C. Petrilla

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Maryanne C. Petrilla, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 04:59, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Maryanne C. Petrilla

I have nominated Maryanne C. Petrilla, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maryanne C. Petrilla. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? umrguy 42 01:18, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Maryanne C. Petrilla, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.luzernecounty.org/county/commissioners/todd_a_vonderheid. As a copyright violation, Maryanne C. Petrilla appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Maryanne C. Petrilla has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Maryanne C. Petrilla and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Maryanne C. Petrilla with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Maryanne C. Petrilla.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. • Gene93k (talk) 06:40, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pennsylvania Association for Rational Sex Offense Laws

Hi there. While reviewing new pages, I noticed that a page you created, Pennsylvania Association for Rational Sex Offense Laws, likely does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines as a standalone article. As an alternative to deletion, I've redirected it to National Association for Rational Sexual Offense Laws, which is the recommended path for regional branches/affiliates of larger organizations under WP:BRANCH. If you disagree, feel free to revert my redirect and we can proceed to a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! P.S. If based on your username you are the John Dawe who runs PARSOL, you have a WP:CONFLICTOFINTEREST with this page and need to disclose this conflict under the terms outlined at WP:PCD. Merry Christmas! Dclemens1971 (talk) 23:17, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]