User talk:Johncellis89

Hello, Johncellis89! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! MBisanzBot (talk) 14:42, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Accounting4Taste:talk 00:59, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Four Clicks to Jesus

A tag has been placed on Four Clicks to Jesus, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Accounting4Taste:talk 00:59, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as Four Clicks to Jesus, you will be blocked. --Blanchardb-Me^MyEars_MyMouth-timed 01:19, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Four clicks to jesus

You are correct about it not being patent nonsense. However, it does not address any evidence of notability, and that is also a reason for deletion. Please do not recreate it again without first discussing with other Wikipedians. Thank you. --Gray Porpoise 01:21, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Four clicks to jesus

A tag has been placed on Four clicks to jesus, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ^Writer_Listener 01:32, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There are now two possible spellings of the name of this article that are protected, and rather than fill up the protection page with variations on this theme, I thought I'd suggest that I see it as more appropriate to block you from making any future contributions unless you stop recreating this article. What path would you prefer? Accounting4Taste:talk 01:36, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Four clicks to Jesus

A tag has been placed on Four clicks to Jesus, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ^Writer_Listener 01:42, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Accounting4Taste:talk 01:44, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

4 clicks

Stop with that. It's not notable but it is unsourced and original research and will be deleted. And if you persist you will be blocked. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 01:45, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Kfrood for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. ^Writer_Listener 02:01, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]