User talk:Johnalphanso

November 2021

Hello, I'm Uranium Site. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Vijaya Mulay, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Uranium Site (talk) 14:20, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Draft:Sanskar Desai, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. David Biddulph (talk) 18:03, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Johnalphanso, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Johnalphanso! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Jtmorgan (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Johnalphanso! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Review of draft, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

Click this link to read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, you can create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sanskar Desai (December 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Sources provided do not provide in-depth coverage about Desai. Most are passing mentions, interviews or other comments he made. However, I think there may be a case for an article about the IDPA.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sanskar Desai and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sanskar Desai, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 20:37, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I was quite disappointed that the draft didn't get approved. Its sad to know that when a prominent & senior person in India working selflessly for the documentary filmmakers work and rights is not considered notable. I have come across some articles on wikipedia about people whose have no standing yet there pages are there and that to the entire page seems as if its meant for self promotion and advertisement. Examples Utpal Datta, Akashaditya Lama written by himself or a PR editor etc..has no proper references but is still there.There are many such articles. Anyways....thanks for your response.