Jump to content

User talk:John P. Sadowski (NIOSH)/Archive 5

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1←Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6

Your draft article, Draft:Epidemiology of COVID-19 by occupation

Hello, John P. Sadowski (NIOSH). It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Epidemiology of COVID-19 by occupation".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:25, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Butler Building

On 8 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Butler Building, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Butler mansion was built with parquette oak floors, elaborate frescos, wainscot paneling—and a fireproof wing to store the archives of the U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Butler Building. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Butler Building), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:03, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Olive Whitlock Klump

On 12 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Olive Whitlock Klump, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Olive Whitlock Klump was the first industrial nurse to work for the U.S. government? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Olive Whitlock Klump. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Olive Whitlock Klump), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:06, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

DYK for United States Marine Hospital (Cincinnati)

On 18 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article United States Marine Hospital (Cincinnati), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the first Cincinnati Marine Hospital was taken by the Department of War, and the second by environmental health scientists? You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, United States Marine Hospital (Cincinnati)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Richards Building

On 22 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Richards Building, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a U.S. secretary of commerce wrote of the Richards Building (pictured), "were there such a function as a public incendiary, these buildings are among the first that should receive his official attention"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Richards Building. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Richards Building), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:01, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Thank you....

I was very cautiously tippy-toeing my way through the easier cite errors in Deployment of COVID-19 vaccines, but had to stop for dinner. Thank you for making the repairs in one fell swoop. It was not my intention to rush you...should I have waited to see if the bot repaired the citations? I have followed the conversation on the talkpage, and deeply appreciate that you were watching over this complex situation.

The splitting of articles is far, far above my WP capability, but observing this situation has been a good learning experience. I will have a better understanding of the problem if I encounter it in the future. Best wishes to you, and thanks for the excellent work you are doing on WP! Sincerely, Tribe of Tiger Let's Purrfect! 02:19, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

@Tribe of Tiger: Glad you were able to learn from this. This was an unusual situation, as the initial split had all incorrect references, so it was hard to keep everything straight. Usually splits are a lot smoother. John P. Sadowski (NIOSH) (talk) 23:36, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
John P. Sadowski (NIOSH), I had never "observed" a split soon after it occurred. Good to know that this one was unusual. It would have taken me awhile to realize they had been shifted, albeit in an orderly fashion, during the split. Thanks again, John, Tribe of Tiger Let's Purrfect! 02:19, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
@Tribe of Tiger: I didn't realize it at first myself; it had never happened before so I didn't think to check. Actually, another user posted on the talk page that one of the references looked wrong, which led me to take a closer look. I think the big lesson here is to double check even if you're not expecting a problem! John P. Sadowski (NIOSH) (talk) 02:29, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
John P. Sadowski (NIOSH), well, here's the funny thing. User:Colin posted because I had spotted the error, and asked him to confirm/advise on what I had seen. He very kindly gave credit, to this shy hesitant editor in his well-written "Mistake....on Moderna" TP post. The reason I checked the particular citation, was because I didn't realize that -40 C & -40 F is the intersection of the two measurements scales! ( Not so good with mathematics/science, but I can read a ref.) So, I checked the ref. The 2014 source absolutely could not support the info regarding the Moderna vaccine. I was hesitant to post on such an important medical article's talkpage, without some support from an experienced editor. I won't hesitate in the future...if I am wrong, someone may swat me down, but if I am correct, it may be important for others to know. Tribe of Tiger Let's Purrfect! 03:14, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

COVID-19_vaccines : Categories, sub-Categories, & lead section orthagonality

@John P. Sadowski (NIOSH)::

Category:COVID-19_vaccines has
I want to add sub-Categories based on storage temperature
  • Category:COVID-19_vaccines, -70°C
  • Category:COVID-19_vaccines, 5°C
I want to add dosages (e.g. 100 µg, 0.5 ml), doses (1,2), stable storage temperature (2–8°C, -70°C) to the lead section of these articles.

Can you help, or is this a good idea? .... 0mtwb9gd5wx (talk) 07:26, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

@0mtwb9gd5wx: I'd suggest posting at WT:COVID to get more feedback. I don't think categories are the right way to show the storage temperature, but that and the dosages can definitely go in the article text. They also might be good for a table in the main COVID-19 vaccine article. John P. Sadowski (NIOSH) (talk) 23:36, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Remdesivir

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has enacted a more stringent set of rules. Any administrator may impose sanctions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

In the article Remdesivir, you recently made substantial changes, including the addition of a primary source supporting a biomedical claim. WP:MEDRS sets the standard for sourcing of biomedical claims as high quality secondary sources, which the source you added does not reach. Moreover, the article is subject to community-imposed general sanctions described at Wikipedia:General sanctions/Coronavirus disease 2019, which specifically requires "Sources for any content related to medical aspects of the disease are expected to adhere to the standards laid down at WP:MEDRS."

I would be grateful, therefore, if you would review your additions to the article and remove all content you added that does not adhere to the standards of MEDRS. --RexxS (talk) 18:03, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Please visit my blog and check the antiviral mechanism of Pyramax.

All thesis on Pyramax, easy explanation using gifs, and contents of global clinical status of Pyramax.

https://blog.naver.com/PostList.nhn?blogId=sizz6789&from=postList&categoryNo=30&parentCategoryNo=30

Englsih translation completed — Preceding unsigned comment added by PaperNerd (talk • contribs) 13:05, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Mechanism GIF [네이버 블로그] Virus mechanism and treatment mechanism by infection stage https://m.blog.naver.com/sizz6789/222251016970

Metaphor analysis [네이버 블로그] Metaphor analysis table to help understanding https://m.blog.naver.com/sizz6789/222251021020

Classification of virus blockers, therapeutics, anti-inflammatory [네이버 블로그] Classification of virus blockers, therapeutics, anti-inflammatory and prophylactic agents https://m.blog.naver.com/sizz6789/222251023861

Comparison of response ability for each substance to virus mutation http://m.blog.naver.com/sizz6789/222251025277 

PaperNerd (talk) 13:55, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

adenovirus vaccines map

hi, i can't understand why you updated this https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/File:COVID-19_adenovirus_vaccines_authorization_map.svg removing my last version and restoring yours. i had added countries as per the most recent version of the article. SquallLeonhart_ITA (talk) 01:58, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

@SquallLeonhart ITA: The version I uploaded should have included everything that is currently in the table at COVID-19 vaccine#List of authorized and approved vaccines, but you're right, it looks like I missed some additions. I'll fix those now. John P. Sadowski (NIOSH) (talk) 02:16, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
I've added back everything that's in the table. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. John P. Sadowski (NIOSH) (talk) 03:08, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

DYK for United States Marine Hospital (Pittsburgh)

On 18 March 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article United States Marine Hospital (Pittsburgh), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the original Pittsburgh U.S. Marine Hospital became a saloon? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/United States Marine Hospital (Pittsburgh). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, United States Marine Hospital (Pittsburgh)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:03, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Temporary buildings of the National Mall

On 27 March 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Temporary buildings of the National Mall, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that temporary war buildings on the National Mall in Washington, D.C., were blamed for "producing a depressing air of slovenliness", but some remained standing for over half a century? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Temporary buildings of the National Mall. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Temporary buildings of the National Mall), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—valereee (talk) 00:02, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

This is an excellent article - thanks for your work on it. Nick-D (talk) 01:40, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Occupational toxicology

On 6 April 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Occupational toxicology, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that studies in occupational toxicology often focus on early effects that are more subtle than those in clinical medicine? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Occupational toxicology. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Occupational toxicology), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 12:02, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious
One year!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:23, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Viral vector vaccine

On 26 April 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Viral vector vaccine, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that viral vector vaccines currently in use include four COVID-19 vaccines and two Ebola vaccines? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Viral vector vaccine. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Viral vector vaccine), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Safe listening

On 3 May 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Safe listening, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that safe listening prevents risks to hearing from voluntary sound exposure rather than unwanted noise? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Safe listening. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Safe listening), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—valereee (talk) 12:02, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Workplace exposure monitoring

On 7 May 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Workplace exposure monitoring, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that chemical warfare agents require specialized equipment for workplace exposure monitoring? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Workplace exposure monitoring. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Workplace exposure monitoring), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

DanCherek (talk) 01:38, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Environmental Health Divisions

On 10 May 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Environmental Health Divisions, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the U.S. Public Health Service Environmental Health Divisions grew from a water-pollution research station in Cincinnati into the modern Environmental Protection Agency? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Environmental Health Divisions. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Environmental Health Divisions), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Thank you!

Very nice work of you and James on items like this on Lung cancer risk among workers in poultry slaughtering and processing plants: a pilot study (Q24351257).--So9q (talk) 09:52, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Division of Industrial Hygiene

On 13 October 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Division of Industrial Hygiene, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Division of Industrial Hygiene moved from a custom-built laboratory at the NIH campus in Bethesda, Maryland, to a converted warehouse in Cincinnati as interest in worker health waned? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Division of Industrial Hygiene. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Division of Industrial Hygiene), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Schwede66 00:03, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Please help to update

I request to update the Covaxin phase-III preprint with the peer review article[1] at the Covaxin#Efficacy and Covaxin#Phase_III_trials sections. thank you. 2402:3A80:6CF:BBB9:CD3F:2714:94D5:8EC5 (talk) 10:01, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

References

  1. ^ Ella, Raches; Reddy, Siddarth; Blackwelder, William; Potdar, Varsha; Yadav, Pragya; Sarangi, Vamshi; Aileni, Vinay K; Kanungo, Suman; Rai, Sanjay; Reddy, Prabhakar; Verma, Savita; Singh, Chandramani; Redkar, Sagar; Mohapatra, Satyajit; Pandey, Anil; Ranganadin, Pajanivel; Gumashta, Raghavendra; Multani, Manish; Mohammad, Shameem; Bhatt, Parul; Kumari, Laxmi; Sapkal, Gajanan; Gupta, Nivedita; Abraham, Priya; Panda, Samiran; Prasad, Sai; Bhargava, Balram; Ella, Krishna; Vadrevu, Krishna Mohan (November 2021). "Efficacy, safety, and lot-to-lot immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (BBV152): interim results of a randomised, double-blind, controlled, phase 3 trial". The Lancet: S0140673621020006. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02000-6.


Archive 1←Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:John_P._Sadowski_(NIOSH)/Archive_5&oldid=1096375525"