User talk:JohnDorianyeah

Welcome

Hello, JohnDorianyeah! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 01:03, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Please add more refs for the new article you created. IMDB in itself is not that much of a ref. Not doing this will lead to the article to get deleted. Thank you.Calaka (talk) 05:26, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Zeke and Luther

You said "removed for no reason". Well FYI buddy, I removed it because I created an article on the list of episodes (See: List of Zeke and Luther episodes). P.S.: I created this article before I removed the episodes from the main "Zeke and Luther" article. --Mr. Comedian (talk) 16:11, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

A user has stated concerns that you may be misusing multiple accounts (see Wikipedia:Sock puppetry policy). Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/PeterGriffin11298 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page.

tedder (talk) 14:44, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JohnDorianyeah (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been accused of sockpuppetry. At first I didn't know because my computer was spoilt and had to be sent to a company to fix it. And when it's fixed. I just found out I was blocked. It says I was accused of sockpuppetry and I couldn't defend myself because the discussion was already over! (and my computer was being fixed) I am not a sockpuppet, this is the only account I use. Even though the evidence is significant, I think it's just a coincidence. Now I've been blocked indefinetly. I'm requesting to be unblocked because I'm innocent, and if I make the same edits as those users, then I'll just make edits to unrelated pages so I don't get accused. Even though CheckUser is right a lot of times, I'm telling you I'm not a sockpuppet, but I can't defend myself since the discussion is over.

Decline reason:

You're going to have to explain how CheckUser, which confirmed you were using an IP address known to be used by this string of sockpuppet accounts, could be wrong about you. Just saying it was wrong without saying why can't go anywhere. Mango juice^talk 16:56, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JohnDorianyeah (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Even though CheckUser is very believable, I think it might have made a slight mistake. I was even shocked that I appeared to be doing edits similar to other users. I think CheckUser thought that I was abusing multiple accounts in fear of being blocked indefitely, when this is the only account I've had. They're are three other accused sockpuppets. I don't know how CheckUser could be wrong, but this is the only account I have and am using. That's why I wish to be unblocked.

Decline reason:

Checkuser evidence quite definitely states that your IP address has been used for vandalism. Saying it cannot be so will not do. To even be considered for unblock, we need a very convincing reason to discount the checkuser evidence. --Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 17:44, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Proposed deletion of Logan Miller

The article Logan Miller has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Most significant role is minor; unsourced BLP.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SummerPhD (talk) 19:49, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jonathan Keltz

The article Jonathan Keltz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced BLP, most significant role is not notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SummerPhD (talk) 19:52, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dan Mott

The article Dan Mott has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Most significant role is minor. Not notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SummerPhD (talk) 20:01, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jarron Vosburg

The article Jarron Vosburg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Most notable role is minor. Unsourced BLP. Not notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SummerPhD (talk) 20:03, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Logan Miller

An article that you have been involved in editing, Logan Miller, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Logan Miller. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. SummerPhD (talk) 02:19, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Dan Mott

An article that you have been involved in editing, Dan Mott, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Mott. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. SummerPhD (talk) 02:23, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello JohnDorianyeah! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 338 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Jonathan Keltz - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Leo Howard - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
William Greenblatt - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:51, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Logan Miller for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Logan Miller is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Logan Miller (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Makro (talk) 16:37, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of William Greenblatt

The article William Greenblatt has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable actor, only external link is IMDb

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 21:18, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]