User talk:John2000

Welcome!

Hello, John2000, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Fenice 14:32, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

john2000

I am a regular contributor and consumer of Wikipedia. Topics of interest include: software development methodologies, computer science, content management, etc.

Contact: john2000@iJSolve.com

update log

 http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Java_2_Platform%2C_Enterprise_Edition
 refined definition to more closely match intent of J2EE specifications.

http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Content_management_system#Types_of_CMS
 fixed copy-editing.

 http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Web_service
 updated JAX-RPC, clarified usage of transport w.r.t. soap and xml.

 http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/applet
 clarified definition of applet, made up-to-date.

 http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Waterphone
 created article on the waterphone (musical instrument).

 http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Interpreter_%28computing%29
 removed pejorative remark against the "java community"

 http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Parameter
 refined definition of parameter as used in mathematics.

 http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Parameter_%28computer_science%29#Calling_conventions
 refined definition of call-by-reference, added call-by-address

Possible Ancestors

Pierre Prieur (c. 1626-1676) was a French enamel painter.

Pierre Louis Prieur (Prieur de la Marne) (August 1, 1756 - May 31, 1827) was a French politician.

Claude Antoine, comte Prieur-Duvernois (December 2, 1763 - August 11, 1832), was a French engineer and a politician during the French Revolution and afterwards.

No Child Left Behind Act

So, where are the pro arguments? Rkevins82 05:07, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

JFSM

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article JFSM, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}.

AfD nomination of Bias disorder

An editor has nominated Bias disorder, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bias disorder and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 01:59, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Plugpoint

The article Plugpoint has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I can find no evidence of consistent established usage for this term. Searching Google for plugpoint API returns no results featuring this word, but pages using "socket" instead; forcing it with +plugpoint API finds nothing. The page is an orphan (no articles link here), and attempted de-orphaning failed 4 years ago. Although this page has been tagged for nine months for transwiki to Wiktionary, I do not think it has valid content to be added there.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Fayenatic London 14:38, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]