User talk:Joggingjack

hello
there is more than one single source quoted already in the article, but beside IMDB some of the references are german newspapers, others as kressreport.de are germany magazines (offline in print and online) about producers, offering more details from third parties as the wikipedia-article itself. also quoted is the international work of the subject (imdb and company-references)
best regards Joggingjack (talk) 20:37, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Joggingjack, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Kristian Widmer, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Minima c (talk) 18:35, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kristian Widmer

The article Kristian Widmer has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Minima c (talk) 18:35, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The International Quorum of Motion Picture Producers

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The International Quorum of Motion Picture Producers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 19:43, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Status and Advice

As reviewing admin, I think this indicates at least some minimal importance, so not appropriate for speedy deletion. But improvement is needed, in particular it must have 3rd party references from reliable published sources to show its importance. I advise you to add this very quickly, before the article gets nominated for deletion by a regular deletion process. Please see our FAQ about businesses, other organisations, and articles like this. DGG ( talk ) 23:12, 18 January 2011 (UTC) .[reply]

Nomination of International Quorum of Motion Picture Producers for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article International Quorum of Motion Picture Producers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Quorum of Motion Picture Producers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- a kendall 14:39, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WP:COI

Your edits appear to center around Kristian Widmer and his projects so I must ask if you have a conflict of interest. As the guidelines on WP:COI says: Editors with a COI, including paid editors, are expected to disclose it whenever they seek to change an affected article's content. Anyone editing for pay must disclose who is paying them, who the client is, and any other relevant affiliation; this is a requirement of the Wikimedia Foundation. Helper202 (talk) 18:50, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Joggingjack

Hello Helper202 No, I am not being paid so there is no conflict of interest. But I admit, I am more active on the German Wiki (although not as much as I was in former years due to limited time).
best regards, Joggingjack (talk) 20:37, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Filmpulse

The article Filmpulse has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacks independent sources, written like an advertisement.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 1292simon (talk) 00:39, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]