User talk:Joerico53

Recent edits to Kim Yuna

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Kim Yuna, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 10:14, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

edit religion data

her religion is catholic, just search it from google. there is also many photos of her baptism. Joerico53 (talk) 16:40, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Christianity, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. RA0808 ^talk _contribs 17:25, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Catholic Church, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 01:57, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Rommel Padilla have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 11:59, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Religions in biographical articles.

Hello. Based from your contributions, you have been very fond of updating articles about living persons' religion in the infobox, even though most of them are not supported by reliable sources. According to WP:BLPCAT:

“

Category names do not carry disclaimers or modifiers, so the case for each content category must be made clear by the article text and its reliable sources. Categories regarding religious beliefs (or lack of such) or sexual orientation should not be used unless the subject has publicly self-identified with the belief or orientation in question, and the subject's beliefs or sexual orientation are relevant to their public life or notability, according to reliable published sources.

”

In the case of adding religions in the infobox, we normally don't put their religion in the infobox anymore, based on a consensus between editors that religion in the infobox should be left out. Rather, their religion (or lack thereof) should be covered in the article, usually under the "Personal life" section of biographical articles.

For instance, in the Liza Soberano article, Soberano acknowledges being a member of the Catholic Church since her baptism and confirmation has gotten coverage by ABS-CBN News and Philippine Entertainment Portal. Therefore, her being a Roman Catholic can be covered under her "early and personal life" since she admits being Catholic.

You can read more about the discussion leaving religions out of infoboxes here: [1]. In a nutshell, you must refrain from adding the "religion" parameter in the infobox in the future; those are reserved for biographies about priests, nuns, or any members of organized religions. And please, try to cite reliable sources to support such claims, and that goes to any content that you're planning to add in a Wikipedia article. matieszyn (talk) 11:39, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]