User talk:Joegarner40
To relook at the allegation Sockpuppet investigation
[edit]Dear Wiki I joined today and I have never used WIKI before so my sincere apologies if you feel or that previous editors feel I done some incorrect. However, I joined Wiki to provided sourced content from a publication that has been around for over 30 years, known as Bros link issue, there were 14 issues published and they were priced £1.50p and published by SMG publication London, which was sold worldwide in a few different countries such as the UK and Australia. I believe printed publication can be used under wiki editorial policy, as I've looked at some SJO edits and I found his person to have used magazine, and unsourced blog material to make many edits, I believe this policy of using printed published content is used by all editors. Also as being part of a many Bros fan-based groups it has come to light that other members have been reported SJO, because they have also been accused of sockpuppetry, it seems this certain editor accuses other members alot, so they can stop everyone editing the page with sourced facts, please see www.brosmusic.co.uk look threw the tons of articles that have been uploaded to this site, from magazines such as Music life, Jackie, Just 17, Smash Hits this publication can be used to edit wiki. It's clearly unfair and undemocratic to allow certain editors to monopolize certain pages, also I believe so correct if me if I am wrong that editors must disprove source before undoing edits. I love to hear your response and if you could kindly provide some reference to disprove the edit I made to bros too much achieving the 250,000 sales, therefore if you contact the BPI you will find that being certified Silver in the UK does not mean you just sold 200,000 a copies of a single, what it actually means you achieved sales between 200,300,000 and I feel that these editors don't understand this. Thank you very much for your time and if you could provide the reference source to disprove my edit and why sjo was allowed to revert edit they did not provide a reasonable reason or link. have a wonderful evening
Sockpuppet investigation
[edit]
An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TomWatkins1970, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.