User talk:Joe damage

"Re-inserted allegations of peadophilia as they are relevant."

On this edit of yours (with the summary above): mere relevance of allegations of criminal activity isn't sufficient. Please read Talk:Graham Fitch, carefully; and if you disagree with what's written there then get agreement there before reinserting any such talk into the article. -- Hoary (talk) 13:29, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Joe damage! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Mhlobo Jadezweni - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:43, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Marlise Keith for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marlise Keith is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marlise Keith until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SarahStierch (talk) 00:17, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hannah Morris (artist) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hannah Morris (artist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hannah Morris (artist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Joe (talk) 11:07, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]