User talk:Joe London

Welcome!

Hello, Joe London, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as FastestLaps, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! §FreeRangeFrog^croak 04:05, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of FastestLaps

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on FastestLaps requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 04:05, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Joe London, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!

The

Adventure

Hi Joe London!! You're invited to play The Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive game to become a great contributor to Wikipedia. It's a fun interstellar journey--learn how to edit Wikipedia in about an hour. We hope to see you there!

Play The Wikipedia Adventure

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:37, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Joe London. You have new messages at Mariordo's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

March 2014

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Ford Crown Victoria, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Bahooka (talk) 22:07, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here. ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Cindy(talk) 23:20, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Joe London (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Block evasion: User:Altimgamr (refer to contributions) — WTF?!!?!?! What did I do? I'm only 14 years old. Joe London (talk) 1:09 am, Today (UTC+0)

Decline reason:

You are quite clearly the same person as User:Altimgamr. Evading the block on that account by creating a new account is not allowed. Yunshui 雲‍水 08:24, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Joe London (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I apologize for what I did—disrupting articles by citing unreliable/invalid sources to statements that are not true, edit-warring via logging out, IP hopping and treating Wikipedia as a game. And yes, I edited and added a variety of articles via my Altimgamr account. I promise that I will not make such mistakes again, nor to let my friends and family create accounts to support me, which is considered meatpuppeting. I will as well promise that if I add any links or sources via sock puppetry, they will be blacklisted, and I will be blocked again. Joe London (talk) 18:49, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Per below. — Daniel Case (talk) 21:51, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

be blocked again. Joe London (talk) 18:49, 18 March 2014 (UTC)}}[reply]

We don't entertain unblock requests by sockpuppets. Ask for an unblock at your main account or (if that has talk page access revoked) via email. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 20:18, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]