User talk:JoeSanchez

Welcome!

Hello, JoeSanchez, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!

If you move a page, don't forget to move the Talk page as well. Don't just copy and paste the contents, that way the edit history gets lost. Er rab ee 14:19, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and one more comment (and I hate to cite rules and regulations, but they are necessary for a coherent content, and if noone told you, how could you possibly learn about it): according to the naming conventions, titles should not be included in the page name of a biography. So Shaykh Abdalqadir as-Sufi should really be listed under Abdalqadir as-Sufi al-Murabit. As I cannot restore this on my own, I'll have to ask someone with more authority to set things straight, and that may take a while. Please continue your work in the mean time. Er rab ee 14:31, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have already moved it to Abdalqadir as-Sufi, which is indeed the correct name. Er rab ee 06:49, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Those redirects will stay in place as long as nobody changes them (and it isn't policy to change them), so anyone searching for Shaykh Abdalqadir as-Sufi will still get to the article. Uniformity across wikis is not the most important subject, uniformity within one wiki is. So while on the English wikipedia it is policy to not include titles, on other wikis it may be policy to include them; that really depends on the community from that wiki.

The main course to improve a rating is to expand the article conform some simple steps: See Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography#WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. After that, you can apply for Good Article Status if you feel your article has been expanded enough to satisfy the Good Article criteria. A peer review might get you some additional comments on how to improve to A-status, and finally a Featured Article review process might get your article elevated to FA status. And I speak just enough Afrikaans to understand what you said without the translation :) Er rab ee 09:02, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That is correct. Er rab ee 12:42, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

But as an afterthought, we do provide links to articles in another wiki. I have searched the Italian wiki, and linked the English article to it. Look for it in the left column. This is the closest wiki can come to cross-language conformity. Er rab ee 13:00, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for testing your editing skills at the Wikipedia Sandbox - it is important for new users to learn how to use Wikipedia and its functions; however when editing their please do not remove the Sandbox header because this is vital in letting other users aware that they can freely edit the page and they are at the right place for their editing tests too. Thank you for you understanding and I hope you enjoy contributing constructively to Wikipedia. Telly addict 13:57, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Abdalqadir as-Sufi

Sorry about the Sidi/Shaykh, when I looked at Muhammad ibn al-Habib I saw that Sidi was the first title and assumed it correct.

Now I have a question about the proper link. In the first line of Abdalqadir as-Sufi it says "...is a Shaykh of Tarbiyah (Instruction), ..." and the link is to Shaykh of Sufism. Later on it says "...as a student of Shaykh Muhammad ibn al-Habib [2],..." where the link "Shaykh" is a redirect to Sheikh. Now based on what I read in "Shaykh of Sufism" and "Sheikh" it would seem to me that whenever the title "Shaykh" is used in the "Abdalqadir as-Sufi" article it means "of Sufism".

As to improvement. First off, I reeally don't edit biographies much and know nothing about Abdalqadir as-Sufi and was just tracking vandalism when I came across the article. It appears to me to have improved quite a lot since it was tagged as "start class". This is how it looked then and this is a comparison of then and now. I would take a look at Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Assessment#Quality scale as that will give you some ideas and then you could re-list it at Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Assessment#Requesting an assessment. You might want to look at Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Members and see if one of the members could give you some tips.

Having said that here are some other ideas. The article is not bad in that it does not over praise him but it does need a criticism section. If you look at Talk:Abdalqadir as-Sufi there are some issues that were raised and they need to be addressed. One thing that is common to all articles, biographies or not, is that they tend to be written by people who know something about it. This is fine, except that we tend to forget others don't have our level of knowledge and may not understand what seems obvious. An example of this is in articles about airports, where I edit a lot, which can be filled with jargon and acronyms, NDB, VOR, DME, etc. Another example is here. It took me some digging to find out that "Masjid" is explained in Mosque but that needs to be balanced against making the intro too long. I changed it a bit so that it's now [[Mosque|masjid]] but at the same time I also changed [[Sufism|Tasawwuf]] to [[Sufism]] (Tasawwuf). With the mosque article it's clear what masjid means in the first line but with the Tasawwuf link it isn't clear at all. Finally, if you can try and look at the article in different browsers. In Firefox it looks fine but in IE the addition of the template causes a lot of whitespace at the top so I moved it down. Hope this helps. Looks like you've done a lot of good work on the article already. Oh, yes, why is he a Dr.? It's in the first line but there is no mention of it in the article. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 23:45, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Al-Alawi.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Al-Alawi.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:44, 30 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 17:44, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Al-Fayturi.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Al-Fayturi.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:45, 30 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 17:45, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Al-Habib.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Al-Habib.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:45, 30 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 17:45, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Saq1.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Saq1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:44, 10 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 20:44, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Darqawi Isnad.gif, Image:Saq2.jpg and Image:Saq3.jpg as well. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 20:44, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Shaykh with dinar.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Shaykh wih dinar.jpg. The copy called Image:Shaykh wih dinar.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 12:44, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate Image:Translation Murabitun.gif

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Translation Murabitun.gif, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Translation Murabitun.gif is a duplicate of an already existing article, category or image.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Translation Murabitun.gif, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 21:31, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Al-Fayturi.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Al-Fayturi.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Also:

ATTENTION: This is an automated, BOT-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate your file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:DarqawiIsnad.gif

Thanks for uploading File:DarqawiIsnad.gif. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Also:

ATTENTION: This is an automated, BOT-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate your file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Saq5.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Saq5.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Al-Alawi.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Al-Alawi.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ⟲ Three Sixty! ^Talk? _Work. 04:37, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]