User talk:Jodysetiawan23

160947

Makaki 209.35.160.50 (talk) 07:17, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Makati

Baba 209.35.160.50 (talk) 07:19, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Jodysetiawan23

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Jodysetiawan23 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 05:03, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

where is the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion"? Jodysetiawan23 (talk) 08:32, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

I've restored the user page. You might want to move it to User:Jodysetiawan23/sandbox as a preferred location for draft articles. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 09:33, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

oke thanks for your help @Ritchie333 i will try it Jodysetiawan23 (talk) 11:14, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

after I moving it to sandbox, so now i'm just waiting until get approved by admin right ? Jodysetiawan23 (talk) 11:19, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

April 2023

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your user page may not meet Wikipedia's user page guidelines. It is intended for basic information about yourself, your interests and goals as they relate to editing Wikipedia, as well as disclosures of conflicts of interest and paid editing. Although a lot of freedom is allowed in personalizing your user page, it is not:

• an encyclopedia article (and should not be styled to look like one)
• a workspace for a draft article
• a personal website, blog, or social media site
• a space for self-promotion or other advertising
• a CV, resumé or lengthy autobiography

The user page guidelines have additional information on what is and what is not considered acceptable content. Please use your user sandbox or the draft article space to practice editing or to create new articles. Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 05:03, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Airpaz (April 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Mcmatter were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Airpaz and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 13:22, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Jodysetiawan23! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 13:22, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Airpaz

Hello, Jodysetiawan23. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Airpaz, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:02, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Airpaz

Hello, Jodysetiawan23. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Airpaz".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:44, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Jodysetiawan23/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Jodysetiawan23/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 14:22, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

December 2024

Hello, Jodysetiawan23. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. A page you created has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic.

This article needs to be rewritten from scratch from reliable, third party sources unconnected to the subject."Before you start writing, gather a list of indisputably reliable sources that are entirely independent of the [subject] and that devote significant coverage to the [subject]. Once you have that list of high quality sources, format them into references. Referencing for beginners explains how. Now, neutrally summarize what the sources say, avoiding any promotional language. You can find much more detailed advice at Your first article." --per Cullen328" Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted.

Information on content and common pitfalls to avoid can be located here and here, however be aware that this is not an exhaustive list. Pages can sometimes avoid these pitfalls and still be seen as an ad copy or unambiguously promotional, particularly if the editor appears to be a paid editor or has some other conflict of interest. Please review these policies, including the FAQ page on organizations to determine if this applies to you.

Common mistakes or beliefs about promotional editing center on the assumption that promotional editing only applies to promotion for commercial gain. Some tags or G11 nominations are met with confusion by creators, particularly if they spend much time reading or creating corporate documents, mission/vision statements, or similar copy for their organization. The frequent exposure to promotional tone may make it difficult to notice non-neutral phrases or styles, as the editor has grown accustomed to seeing it as everyday writing or speech. This can be difficult, but not impossible, to unlearn.

Another common assumption is that the prohibition against promotional editing applies only to businesses or organizations. It applies to any topic, including a person, a non-commercial organization, a point of view, etc. and CV/resumé's are by their nature promotional.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and providing verifiable information. That generally means someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. Please see this page on citing sources and Wikipedia:Common sourcing mistakes (notability). This page has templates you can use in citing your sources. Place the template {{Reflist}} at the bottom of the page, and references cited in the text will appear there. New article creation can be difficult, but the Article Wizard can help you. The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems.You can ask for help at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk and on IRC chat Wikipedia:The Wikipedia Adventure is a useful tutorial.

New article creation can be difficult and frustrating. Sometimes it is better to first gain experience by fixing and helping maintain existing articles. Wikipedia:Community portal/Opentask contains links to things that badly need doing, if you are so inclined.

This notice is information dense. Please carefully read and thoroughly understand the linked information before attempting further article creation.

🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 14:23, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Hi 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥 I only know to remove the content service is like promotional, could you give the other detail on which part of content sound promotional ? and also could you restore it? so I can editing the content depend on the wikipedia policy

Thank you! Jodysetiawan23 (talk) 03:44, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 14:23, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Reply

You have an obvious conflict of interest and you must declare it. If you work directly or indirectly for an organisation, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. If you are paid directly or indirectly by the organisation you are writing about, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at Jodysetiawan23. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Jodysetiawan23|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message. Also read the following regarding writing an article:

• you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation or company, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, logs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company or organisation claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls

• You had no in-line references at all.

• The notability guidelines for organisations and companies have been updated. The primary criteria has five components that must be evaluated separately and independently to determine if it is met:

1. significant coverage in
2. independent,
3. multiple,
4. reliable,
5. secondary sources.

Note that an individual source must meet all four criteria to be counted towards notability. To show notability you need hard verifiable facts such as the number of employees, management structure, turnover or profits.

• You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.

• Your text was fact-free promo eg The founder saw great potential in flight industry that was growing at that time. As the result, they find an idea of creating flight and hotel ticket's purchasing service via online. After getting a solid idea and concept in place, they made a team to develop the company until now

• There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
• You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Your draft will not be accepted as it stands. Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:44, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Thanks Jimfbleak for your guide. Could please review my new article on here ? https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:Jodysetiawan23/sandbox

I was checked you have reviewed the article in 2018, here the new one in 2025 Jodysetiawan23 (talk) 11:13, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

You seem to have two drafts on the go at the same time, don't do that.I've moved your sandbox version to Draft:Airpaz in place of the version that was already there. Your refs are all bare urls, apart from the history, it's still light on real facts, and the text is still promotional company speak eg leading online travel agents... comprehensive services... offers a simple flight and hotel booking process with various options... enhances travelers’ experiences with affordable prices, exclusive offers, reliable payment option.... No chance of it being accepted without formatted refs and a neutral tone. Please read the guidance above carefully. If you don't follow the advice, your article will be rejected and deleted, and you may be blocked Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:59, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

You shouldn't have deleted the draft. I had it restored a week back based on request by Jodysetiawan23. It had history from 2023 and had been reviewed as well. The sandbox could have been merged into that. Jay 💬 12:13, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Did not get a response from you. I have restored the draft you deleted. Moved the sandbox version to Draft:Airpaz (2). Jay 💬 14:19, 4 January 2025 (UTC)