Jump to content

User talk:Jockey456

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello Jockey456! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Hipal (talk) 16:07, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

April 2023

[edit]

Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that in this edit to List of programs broadcast by Hum Sitaray, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 10:36, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Adakiko Thank you for the guidance, I'll take care of it now. Jockey456 (talk) 10:41, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tumse Mil Kay moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Tumse Mil Kay, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 12:20, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Onel5969 Hey there! kindly suggest how can I make it more sustainable? Help me out in this. Thank you! Jockey456 (talk) 11:27, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. You need in-depth coverage about the film, not simply mentions, and casting notices. And they should come from reliable sources. Hope that helps. Onel5969 TT me 11:36, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Onel5969 Thank you ! Does the references from social media (Instagram, Facebook) counts? Jockey456 (talk) 11:47, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Onel5969 Thank you ! Does the references from social media (Instagram, Facebook) counts? Jockey456 (talk) 11:48, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No. YouTube, FB, Twitter, Instagram, etc, all are unreliable sources. As are certain things like IMDb and similar film databases. Onel5969 TT me 11:50, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Onel5969 ok thank you, what if I couldn't find more sources? will it be deleted? Jockey456 (talk) 12:11, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Eventually. Drafts stay there for 6 months, to allow you time to bring them up to notability/quality standards. If no work is done on it for 6 months, it will get deleted. Onel5969 TT me 12:30, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Reviews of the film are a very good source, forgot to mention that.
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Ponyobons mots 21:33, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]