User talk:Joan Bailey/sandbox
Name of student reviewer: Alyssa Bhagwandin
Date of review: 05/15/13
Name of editor: Paula Guthrie
URL of editor’s Userpage: http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/user:Joan_Bailey/sandbox
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page: 05/15/13
Date review submitted to instructor: 05/15/13
Length of edit (too long/too short): I think it was a good length it wasn’t too short or long, and the bulletin points have it some length
Image (needed/appropriate): No image needed
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit): Yes used text book information
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed: Yes used an article
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych): Yes, adherent to I/O psychology
Wikiformatting: The format was following wikiformatting
Grammar & composition: Grammar and composition was good
Other comments: Over all good job, the topic was interesting as well.
Name of student reviewer: Savitrie Rampersaud
Date of review: 05/07/13
Name of editor: Paula Guthrie
URL of editor’s Userpage: http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/user:Joan_Bailey/sandbox
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page: 05/07/13
Date review submitted to instructor: 05/07/13
Length of edit (too long/too short): too long
Image (needed/appropriate): N/A
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit): Yes
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed: Yes
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych): Yes
Wikiformatting:
Grammar & composition: Good grammar and composition
Other comments: Good Job
........................................................ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.189.145.34 (talk) 01:07, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Name of student reviewer: Jasmine R Basnight
Date of review: 05/06/13
Name of editor: Paula Guthrie
URL of editor’s Userpage: http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/user:Joan_Bailey/sandbox
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page: 05/06/13
Date review submitted to instructor: 05/06/13
Length of edit (too long/too short): The edit was a great length
Image (needed/appropriate): N/A
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit): Yes
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed: Yes
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych): Yes
Wikiformatting: bullets and numerical, list form
Grammar & composition: Good grammar and composition
Other comments: Great job!
| Name of student reviewer | Wikipedia User:CRamel16 |
|---|---|
| Date of review | 05/07/2013 |
| Name of editor**Replace with username for version on talk page** | Wikipedia User:Joan_Bailey/sandbox |
| URL of editor’s Userpage | http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/user:Joan_Bailey/sandbox |
| Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page | 05/07/13 |
| Date review submitted to instructor | 05/07/13 |
| Length of edit (too long/too short) | Perfect length |
| Image (needed/appropriate) | Image appropriate |
| Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) | The information is relevant to the text. |
| Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed | N/A |
| Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) | N/A |
| Wikiformatting | Might want to use bullet points. |
| Grammar & composition | Well done |
| Other comments | use external links for extra credits |
| Name of student reviewer | Wikipedia User:Nikicia |
|---|---|
| Date of review | May 7,2013 |
| Name of editor**Replace with username for version on talk page** | Wikipedia User:Joan Bailey |
| URL of editor’s Userpage | http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/user:Joan_Bailey/sandbox |
| Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page | May 7, 2013 |
| Date review submitted to instructor | May 7, 2013 |
| Length of edit (too long/too short) | Length is good |
| Image (needed/appropriate) | Image not needed |
| Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) | Information is accurate |
| Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed | Yes |
| Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) | Good |
| Wikiformatting | Good formatting |
| Grammar & composition | Very minor spelling errors |
| Other comments | Great Job Nikicia (talk) 07:49, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback[edit]Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback Name of student reviewer: Aisha Hamid Date of review: 5/9/2013 Name of editor: Joan Bailey URL of editor’s Userpage: http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/user:Joan_Bailey/sandbox Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page: 5/9/2013 Date review submitted to instructor: 5/9/2013 Length of edit (too long/too short): The length of the edit is lengthy, but you have provided a great amount of material. Image (needed/appropriate): N/A Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit): You have cited two things under your edit. But you didn’t provide page numbers. But it is very relevant to the text. (But should put page numbers) Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed: Along with the use of the text for your turnover article you also provided an article and yes it does fill all the criteria. Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych): Yes the information is accurate to I/O. Wikiformatting: Excellent formatting, I think has been the best formatting I have seen from all the ones I have edited. Grammar & composition: Found no errors. Other comments: Over all great edit, Good Luck |