User talk:Jnb845

November 2013

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to South Korea, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Oda Mari (talk) 18:02, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at South Korea, you may be blocked from editing. Incorrect ranking? This CIA page says it's 51st and the CIA World Factbook is a RS. If the ranking is incorrect, what about this edit of yours? The ranking should be also incorrect, isn't it? The CIA page says it's 76th. If you think the CIA page is incorrect, why don't you undo your edit? Please answer my questions. Oda Mari (talk) 09:43, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at France–South Korea relations, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Oda Mari (talk) 16:24, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Varnent. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Ji-hu, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Varnent (talk)^(COI) 17:26, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In the future, please use #REDIRECT [[Target page name]] rather than blanking a page. Alternatively, you can request it be deleted. --Varnent (talk)^(COI) 17:51, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Ji-hu a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut-and-paste-move repair holding pen. Thank you. quant18 (talk) 03:21, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Visa requirements for South Korean citizens. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you.--Twofortnights (talk) 12:30, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Visa requirements for South Korean citizens, you may be blocked from editing. --Twofortnights (talk) 20:50, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Republic of Korea passport, you may be blocked from editing. --Twofortnights (talk) 20:50, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Visa requirements for South Korean citizens, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Twofortnights (talk) 22:16, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Visa requirements for South Korean citizens. --Twofortnights (talk) 12:15, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Gwangju20131106.png

Thanks for uploading File:Gwangju20131106.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 00:45, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Visa requirements for South Korean citizens, you may be blocked from editing. --Twofortnights (talk) 02:26, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Republic of Korea passport, you may be blocked from editing. --Twofortnights (talk) 02:26, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Visa requirements for South Korean citizens. --Twofortnights (talk) 03:33, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Republic of Korea passport. --Twofortnights (talk) 03:33, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Visa requirements for South Korean citizens. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. EoRdE6^{(Come Talk to Me!)} 14:33, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Swarm ^X 21:37, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

English language article talk page has discussion of dialect groupings

Hi, Jnb845,

Please feel free to discuss the source support for your latest edit to English language. Several editors have most of the sources at hand in their offices and are working carefully to revise the article. See you on the wiki. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit) 15:36, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rather than revert without even an edit summary, please explain why you think reliable sources support (as I have reason to think they do not) the article text edit you have just redone. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jnb845. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jnb845. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jnb845. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]