User talk:Jmthomas651
Mr. Bubble
[edit]I have reverted your edits to Mr. Bubble. Wikipedia should not be used as an advertising vehicle for your company. --Captain Infinity (talk) 02:22, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
- Much of the information you have been adding would be fine if it was presented in a neutral point of view manner, as straight data, but as you have written it it makes the article sound like an ad for The Village Company. As for the T-shirt offer, I think your idea of mentioning that it exists on the package would be OK, but detailing how one applies for it, how much it costs, and so on, would be too much like an ad. Thanks for not taking offense at my edits. --Captain Infinity (talk) 20:16, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- Nope, no offense taken; I appreciate your help actually in making sure the article is neutral. I really don't want it to be an ad. Besides, like I said, I don't really know what I'm doing and I can tell that you do. Is there anyway I can get it back to the updated version plus a more neutral stance? Thanks again! Jmthomas651 (talk) 20:53, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- I'll take a look at the article history over the weekend and see if I can shape the data. I'll run it by you for tweaking and maybe together we can develop something that works. --Captain Infinity (talk) 01:12, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- So I took a shot at editing the article again, with a neutral point of view this time (I think!). Feel free to make any changes you see fit, but please let me know why you add/remove something if you do. And thanks again for all your time in helping me edit this article! Jmthomas651 (talk) 21:22, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- I'll take a look at the article history over the weekend and see if I can shape the data. I'll run it by you for tweaking and maybe together we can develop something that works. --Captain Infinity (talk) 01:12, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- Nope, no offense taken; I appreciate your help actually in making sure the article is neutral. I really don't want it to be an ad. Besides, like I said, I don't really know what I'm doing and I can tell that you do. Is there anyway I can get it back to the updated version plus a more neutral stance? Thanks again! Jmthomas651 (talk) 20:53, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:MrB-LOGO.jpg)
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:MrB-LOGO.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:12, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
){kind=link}