User talk:Jmkrangers

Image copyright problem with File:2009 Memorial Cup.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:2009 Memorial Cup.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:24, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:KITCHENER PANTHERS CAP.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:KITCHENER PANTHERS CAP.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 04:29, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:KITCHENER PANTHERS CAP.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:KITCHENER PANTHERS CAP.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:29, 19 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 04:29, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:KITCHENER PANTHERS WIKI.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:KITCHENER PANTHERS WIKI.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 04:29, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:KITCHENER PANTHERS WIKI.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:KITCHENER PANTHERS WIKI.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:29, 19 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 04:29, 19 May 2010 (UTC) {subst:di-orphaned fair use-notice|1=KITCHENER PANTHERS.JPG}} Salavat (talk) 04:29, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:KITCHENER PANTHERS.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:KITCHENER PANTHERS.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:29, 19 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 04:29, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:KITCHENER PANTHERS.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:KITCHENER PANTHERS.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 04:30, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:2011 Memorial Cup.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:2011 Memorial Cup.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:13, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Major Mini-Stick League for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Major Mini-Stick League is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Major Mini-Stick League until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Salimfadhley (talk) 22:17, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Major Mini-Stick Legaue Logo.jpg

The file File:Major Mini-Stick Legaue Logo.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 15:22, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mennonite Church sexual abuse cases (February 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ReaderofthePack was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This needs to discuss the cases rather than contain a list of news articles. It should be written akin to the article on Catholic Church sexual abuse cases. You must also be very careful with how this is worded, as not all of the cases went beyond people speaking up in the news (ie, no legal cases). This is for legal reasons, mostly. I highly, highly recommend that you solicit help from Wikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, Wikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Christianity, as controversial topics like this can be very difficult to put together.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anabaptist/Mennonite Church sexual abuse cases and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Anabaptist/Mennonite Church sexual abuse cases, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:19, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmkrangers! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:19, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Jmkrangers! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:20, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New message from ReaderofthePack

Hello, Jmkrangers. You have new messages at ReaderofthePack's talk page.
Message added 04:59, 20 February 2021 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:59, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mennonite Church sexual abuse cases has been accepted

Mennonite Church sexual abuse cases, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

(t · c) buidhe 23:37, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anabaptist/Mennonite Church sexual misconduct cases feedback

Hi! I’m pretty sure I’m not reporting this in the right place, but this was the only place I could find. I noticed you were the last person to edit the sexual abuse page; I found an ‘error’ that I think needs correcting, and since I’m not allowed to correct it, I was hoping maybe you could. Under the victims - spouses section, there is no mention of men being victims or lgbtq+ relationships. I think a lot of people read these kinds of pages in hopes of finding answers about something bad that has happened to them, and I wouldn’t want people to feel excluded during a search like that because of harmful stereotypes. I hope you or someone reading this can help. Have a good day!

Hi. Thanks for this feedback. This is the first time I tried writing an article for Wikipedia and I did so for the reason you mentioned: having information available and accessible online can help people and communities become aware of and understand the widespread nature of these issues and give people who were victimized some guidance and hope about seeking justice, understanding, and healing.

I understand where you’re coming from and that’s a good point you bring up that victims can be male or LGBTQ+ not just women and what has been written here does not reflect this enough. If I were to say write a research paper or article for a journal, newspaper or magazine educating people on sexual misconduct/abuse that has occurred in the Anabaptist/Mennonite church I would likely take a different approach and structure and would take time to outline the variety of experiences and demographics of victims. These kind of articles can be used for advocacy, I would use my own intuition, experiences and opinions more.

But on Wikipedia, all I can do is reference papers and studies and news articles and other publications that are already published because it’s a site that anyone can edit and if people are able to add their own experiences and insights without citing it would take away the reliability of the site and articles could be abused to push false information and people’s opinions into mainstream public knowledge since Wikipedia is so well-known and accessible (Wikipedia pages are almost always one of the first results in Google search results).

Long story short: I do think it’s important to highlight that victims can be from different genders and sexual orientations but there were no reliable news articles, and scholarly papers about this specifically from my research when writing the initial draft for this so that’s why it’s not in the article. But again being Wikipedia, it’s not meant to be a final draft, it’s able to be continually built on and edited when new information becomes available. Any one can do research and edit.

So if you have some information from reliable sources to add feel free to add or change or edit this page at anytime (make sure you cite if you do)! If you don’t know how to do this I can try to help by explaining how I do it or refer you to YouTube videos or other resources to help with editing.

Thanks again for reaching out 2607:FEA8:1CA0:EA00:A925:B11C:6038:AA0 (talk) 15:36, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]