User talk:Jmccauley

Dear Mr. McCauley: I made some comments on Talk:Rational expectations explaining why I deleted the section you added to Rational expectations. Basically my point is that 'equilibrium', like many words, has more than one meaning. Most economists today, following Nash, use 'equilibrium' to mean mutual consistency between the actions of several agents. That's what economists mean when they talk about rational expectations equilibrium. Of course, that is a different from the way the word is used in statistical physics. Please reply at Talk:Rational expectations if you think I am mistaken. --Rinconsoleao (talk) 14:58, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=J._Doyne_Farmer&diff=prev&oldid=483301900 is surely vandalism? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.193.162.207 (talk) 17:21, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]