User talk:Jlopez4758/sandbox

Jlopez peer review

There are some grammatical errors, the headings are not bold, underlined, or separated, and the reference links aren't connected to anything. I feel like that's a technical issue. Other than that, the intro is a good summary, the voice is neutral, there is an attempt at organization (again the separation was off) and the wording is easy to understand.

Response

Thanks for the response. I was particularly concerned about the neutral voice, so thanks for clearing that up with me. I will look over grammar as I move forward. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jlopez4758 (talk • contribs) 04:27, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Jlopez peer review

There are some grammatical errors, the headings are not bold, underlined, or separated, and the reference links aren't connected to anything. I feel like that's a technical issue. Other than that, the intro is a good summary, the voice is neutral, there is an attempt at organization (again the separation was off) and the wording is easy to understand. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MaximillianSearles (talk • contribs) 20:41, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Response

Thanks for these cosmetic reviews. I am planning on tightening up these issues as I go along. Organization is a big one with Wiki. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jlopez4758 (talk • contribs) 04:28, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Jlopez4758 peer review

You have a good foundation but some of your paragraphs do not flow due to incomplete sentences. I would suggest combining some of your shorter sentences into one longer sentence. Overall, the articles voice is neutral and covers a wide range of topics relevant to Agnodice. I enjoyed reading your intro, but I recommend adding a few more words about Gaius Julius Hyginus because the sentence is abrupt.Ingridxreyes (talk) 22:20, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

response

I appreciate your collegiality. This is the second time I've gotten feedback on neutrality. I'm glad for the reassurance. I'll check over the mentioned discrepancies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jlopez4758 (talk • contribs) 04:30, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Jlopez4758 peer review

You have a great start to your article it was a very interesting. I was suggest shorting some sentences other then that it is good so far! I wish I knew enough about the topic to comment and further. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Asdf12356 (talk • contribs) 03:20, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

Polishing my work

To polish my work, I've been editing the content I've added and even added more of it directly into the Wikipedia page I'm working on. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jlopez4758 (talk • contribs) 20:06, 30 November 2018 (UTC)