User talk:Jkorsunsky

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

Jkorsunsky (talk · contribs) has been paid by Gregory Katz on their behalf. https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Gr%C3%A9gory_Katz&type=revision&diff=954038051&oldid=954035244

.

Jkorsunsky, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Jkorsunsky! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Nick Moyes (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:09, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Jkorsunsky. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Grégory Katz, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. ——SN 54129 12:39, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A crash course in Wikipedia

Hello editors, I am new to editing in Wikipedia, and so far it's been a learning experience, to say the least.
Firstly, I have just declared my status as a paid editor at the top of this page. I was unaware that such a step was necessary, nor did I know that such a status existed. However, after reading the related articles, I perfectly understand the need for this and am more than happy to comply.
I am a freelance writer and have been working off an on for Gregory Katz for more than 10 years as a medical writer and translator, and am therefore familiar with his work. Katz, an academic, is currently paying me by the hour to improve the Gregory Katz article. I am not a "professional" wikipedia editor. This is the first article I have edited, and I do not plan on making a career of this. I have the utmost respect for the wikipedia enterprise and like many people am a frequent user. My goal, and Katz's goal for that matter, is to remove obsolete or erroneous information, and to update and expand the article with more recent information. The fact that a large chunk of my editing was recently removed has led me to better understand the standards and form expected of a wiki article, and I wish to comply with such standards to the best of my understanding. I look forward to presenting requests for further changes on this Talk page, and to having open discussion with other editors.

Your article, My edits

I have edited your article and removed content. I will explain to you why I removed it, so that you dont put it back again and again without even knowing what is going on. As this seems to be part of your job. This edit removed content that was not sourced. To put it back you need a source that is according to WP:RS that says the same thing. In my second edit I rearranged the article wording a little bit and then removed his awards. The awards are a problem because I cannot find any mention of them anywhere. I mean if you win an oscar, there are reliable sources telling us what an oscar is. On the other hand, we have no knowledge of what these awards are. On top of that, the first two websites do not match the content. In my third edit I removed the award his book had recieved because once again, no sources that such an award exists. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 15:31, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Jkorsunsky! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Moving a page, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gregory Katz for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gregory Katz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gregory Katz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) 03:53, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]