User talk:Jjj222

Joe Girardi

I'm done with the edit warring. There's a comment page. I agreed with his idea and you simply re-amplified him as a Cub. Use the discussion page before dealing with "sensitive editing". Mghabmw 17:40, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"I would advise that you stay away from articles you got in trouble in though; another breach of the rules and people will not be so kind."

They shortened user:Pascack's block and wrote that. Girardi is one of those articles. Use the discussion page. I'm not changing the colors, though I do find red on blue pleasing to the eye to be the top color, but it is seemingly fairer. Mghabmw 17:47, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just use the talk page. Mghabmw 17:52, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hello?

You would 'advise' me? Is that a threat? What are you going to do? Mghabmw 13:54, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just find it funny how your first ever edit is about Joe Girardi and then you go and fight for infobox colors for former NY Mets. Especially at the timing your account popped up. Maybe it's just coincidence. Mghabmw 14:11, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Listen, I don't believe you and for the slight chance that you may be telling the truth, you are carrying on the work of Pascack, a recently blocked user. You just jumped right in to do what he does without skipping a beat and your first edit just happened to be during the short time when the block was lifted. Mghabmw 14:20, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Change 'em from red on blue. Mghabmw 14:54, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gary Carter

That picture you put of Gary Carter is not an HoF picture. Though I know you're a Mets fan (hmm...), please refrain from uploading copyrighted pictures, especially ones with the wrong tags. Mghabmw 22:22, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot modify the photo. You did. Therefore, it is not within the limitations set by the HoF. Mghabmw 22:26, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There's a perfectly fine picture of Gary Carter. Mghabmw 22:36, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Are you going to change existing pictures? Mghabmw 22:41, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Hunter.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hunter.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:07, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures

Just find the picture of him, hit print screen. Paste in paintbrush (or any image editor) and save as *.png If there's ANY captions on the picture, you MUST write them down on the infobox AND on the image page. Take Carlton Fisk for example.

And please, try extracting an image that shows the player representing the team he's inducted under. I'm a Yankees fan, there's a pic of Wade Boggs in a Yankees uniform - I uploaded a Boston pic.

And try finding a caption that doesn't sound so... opinionated. Mghabmw 22:46, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There's already a pic of Tom Seaver on his page. Mghabmw 22:47, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Garycarter.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Garycarter.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:04, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Dykstra 06.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Dykstra 06.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 02:51, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Seaver.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Seaver.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you havhttp://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jjj222&action=edit Editing User talk:Jjj222 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediae edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Jusjih 19:08, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reggie Jackson

Scroll down to the bottom of the page of this page.

Images

Please give correct sourcing statements for your images and familiarize yourself with Wikipedia image policy. If a free image is available for a given article, instead of one with a copyright on it, we must use the free one. You must assume that all images you find online, unless stated otherwise, are copyrighted. Please do not lie about having taken an image yourself, as you seem to have done here. You may be blocked if you continue to disobey Wikipedia editing policy. Thank you for your cooperation. Regards, Signature ^brendel 07:15, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Block notice

You have been warned and I am now assuming that you are familiar with Wikipedia image and editing policies. Fighting an edit war, aimed at replacing free with copyrighted images, is an blatant violation of two Wikipedia policies. Your block will expire in 24h. If you wish to continue editing Wikipedia, please mind our copyright and editing policies: don't fight edit wars (even if they're slow-motion) and don't replace free with copyrighted images. Thank you, Signature ^brendel 09:34, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reggie Jackson

I'm not going to touch it again but I still dont agree with it, I mean most people wanted Yankees colors and hes in the Hall of Fame as a Yankee, so I dont know why we dont change it Yankees colors, the only reason I think Kingston Eagle wants neutral colors is because he voted for A's colors--Yankees10 22:48, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message Jjj222, and from here on out I will assume good faith with you. Googie man 23:37, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Dykstra 06.jpg

The file File:Dykstra 06.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]