User talk:Jith12/Archives/2018/March
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Jith12. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:39, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
Signpost issue 4 – 29 March 2018
- News and notes: Wiki Conference roundup and new appointments.
- Arbitration report: Ironing out issues in infoboxes; not sure yet about New Jersey; and an administrator who probably wasn't uncivil to a sockpuppet.
- Traffic report: Real sports, real women and an imaginary country: what's on top for Wikipedia readers
- Featured content: Animals, Ships, and Songs
- Technology report: Timeless skin review by Force Radical.
- Special report: ACTRIAL wrap-up.
- Humour: WikiWorld Reruns
Jack Dorsey
Look, you clearly don't care about the conspiracy between Jack Dorsey and the New World Order to take our dogs away from us by using Twitter to trick the Satanists into convincing the Illuminati to serve a grilled cheese sandwich to Michelle Obama. I won't bother correcting the Jack Dorsey 'article' anymore because you are obviously working for the Dorsey-Bush-Clinton-Chuck-E-Cheese CIA. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:2C47:1500:1D53:DA61:8177:B83D (talk) 22:08, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
- It is quite obvious that you know more about this conspiracy theory than I do. Thank you for choosing not to include it in the Dorsey article again, you've saved me the trouble from having to revert it. Anyways, is there any way for you to get the Illuminati to serve me that grilled cheese sandwich instead? I wouldn't mind one right about now! And by the way, I've been on Wikipedia for a little while now and "Dorsey-Bush-Clinton-Chuck-E-Cheese CIA" has to be one of the funniest things I've seen so far. And no, I'm not working for those "people", I'm just a kid from Canada with a bit of time on my hands. Cheers mate, happy Easter! (Hope weather's nice in London! And on second thought don't send the Illuminati here, that's probably not the brightest idea.) Jith12 (talk) 22:23, 29 March 2018 (UTC)