User talk:Jimpaz

Welcome!

Hello, Jimpaz, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Cheers, -- Infrogmation 08:44, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Yaxbalam.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Yaxbalam.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:00, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Yaxbalam.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Yaxbalam.gif. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:22, 8 January 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. cjllw | TALK 01:22, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jimpaz- as an addendum to the standard notification above, several other imgs you have uploaded also currently do not specify the source (image:Xbalanque.gif,image:A Hun Ajaw.jpg,image:Hunahpu.gif). Note that the source is required even if you are maintaining these imgs are in the Public Domain, or otherwise ineligible for copyright. Also, even if these are (presumably) illustrations of glyphs and depictions from pre-Columbian sources, that does not automatically mean these particular illustrations are ineligible for copyright. It would depend on whether or not they are as redrawn by some modern researcher or illustrator, in which case copyright might still apply (to this particular rendition). If these are cropped from facsimile reproductions of some "old" (eg codex) document, as seems to be the case for A Hun Ajaw.jpg, then that would be a different matter, as would be the case if they are your own drawings. However, if you are able to annotate the source for these on the respective image pages, then that would help clarify the matter. Regards, --cjllw | TALK 01:35, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ficklepicker

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ficklepicker, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Ficklepicker. JackSchmidt (talk) 21:27, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your 16 April 2018 edit to "Toronto"

Greetings and felicitations. I noticed that you added the climate chart to Toronto. Unfortunately, you forgot to add the named reference ("<ref name="TORONTO"/>") for it, resulting in the error "Cite error: The named reference TORONTO was invoked but never defined (see the help page)." Would you please be so kind as to complete the reference? —DocWatson42 (talk) 12:39, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I added it. Thanks for the notification! Jimpaz (talk) 22:56, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome, and thank you. ^_^ —DocWatson42 (talk) 10:05, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Samosa

Hi Jimpaz, I noticed that your edit to Samosa was reverted. Your contributions are appreciated, and although in the end I agree with the reversion, I think you deserve a better explanation. The reason given, "its definitely spam and the source is primary and therefore violates gng)" is incorrect. There's nothing about your edit that seems like spam to me. The part about it violating WP:GNG is nonsense, as that only applies to whether a subject is notable enough to have its own Wikipedia article. Article content is not required to meet that notability guideline. However, the problem is that the information is relatively trivial in nature; we can't list every place in the world where samosas are enjoyed by their fans. The relevant policy for that is undue weight, which is similar in some ways to the notability requirement. If the McGill story had received significant attention in the national news media, it could possibly be included - but even then it might be unlikely, because of the idea that Wikipedia is not a newspaper. In this particular case, probably it would have to have been written about in several books on the subject, and ideally mentioned by other encyclopedias like Britannica. As that's not the case, it doesn't really fit in the article. Thanks for your understanding, and I hope you'll continue to contribute to Wikipedia. --IamNotU (talk) 20:13, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That makes sense. I understand. Thank you for taking the time to write this. Jimpaz (talk) 20:06, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Festival Ballet Providence

Hello, Jimpaz. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Festival Ballet Providence".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:26, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Festival Ballet Providence

Hello, Jimpaz. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Festival Ballet Providence".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 10:20, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Festival Ballet Providence has been accepted

Festival Ballet Providence, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Primefac (talk) 01:48, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Unidad de Fomento a la Vivienda has been accepted

Unidad de Fomento a la Vivienda, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rkieferbaum (talk) 13:17, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Ballet RI.webp

Thanks for uploading File:Ballet RI.webp. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:31, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have updated the image as a lower-resolution version, and added the "{{non-free logo}}" template and rationale. Jimpaz (talk) 18:19, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Jimpaz. Thank you for your work on Unidad de Fomento de Vivienda. User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 01:02, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]