User talk:Jimmyy68

Welcome!

Hello, Jimmyy68, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to 5th millennium BC. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! No Great Shaker (talk) 15:25, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

Hello, I'm STATicVapor. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Bill Goldberg, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. StaticVapor message me! 18:36, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Nazi Party; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.

Nazi Party

Please see the Infobox: "Leader" discussion on Talk:Nazi Party. Beyond My Ken (talk) 01:49, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you don't understand...

Wikipedia is based on WP:Verifiability. Verifiability is reached through the use of citations from WP:Reliable sources. Sir Ian Kershaws 2-part biography of Hitkler is considered to be the utmost in reliability for information regarding Hitler. When I changed the dates in the infobox for when Drexler was replaced by Hitler as the leader of the Nazi Party, I provided a citation from Kershaw to support it. My having done that verifies the information. Now, if you disagree, you must start a discussion on the article's talk page. You cannnot -- are not allowed to -- removed reliably sourced information from an article without con WP:Consensus to do so, which is reached by discussion on the talk page.

Please do not remove the reliable sourced dates again. Thank you. Beyond My Ken (talk) 06:42, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

See Talk:Nazi Party#Date of transition. Beyond My Ken (talk) 06:58, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please use edit summaries

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! El_C 08:07, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Steven Anderson (pastor), you may be blocked from editing. Elizium23 (talk) 19:09, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why would I be blocked from editing? Jimmyy68 (talk) 20:28, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jimmyy68, because our biography policies require you to add a reliable secondary source whenever you add a fact about a living person. Please read the policies and acquaint yourself with their requirements, you are expected to know them by now. Elizium23 (talk) 20:31, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Steven Anderson’s full name is Steven Lee Anderson. I thought it would be helpful to include that. Even Barack Obama’s full name is listed in his Wikipedia Page. Jimmyy68 (talk) 20:34, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, because we have documentary evidence of Obama's full name. Please provide documentary evidence, and we will gladly include whatever facts you want in the article. Thanks! Elizium23 (talk) 20:52, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have added three refs to support "Steven Lee Anderson" as this person's full name. Beyond My Ken (talk) 21:24, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Facebook is no good, not verified. I'd question the RS status of the Daily Voice, too. It has no staff listing, anonymous bylines, and self-identifies as a tabloid.

I'm not saying that the man's middle name isn't Lee, it's just that we need actual sources to cite in BLPs. Elizium23 (talk) 21:28, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Is mylife.com a reliable source? Jimmyy68 (talk) 21:24, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2020 United States presidential election

Hi, I reverted your edit at 2020 United States presidential election as you broke the infobox template see here. Besides that I do think it's too soon to be adding him in that manner - he's not even registered yet. If you do want to add him back then I won't revert but please preview your edit so you can ensure no malformation of the template. Thanks. Glen 13:45, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Karl Marx, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. RolandR (talk) 13:03, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, sir. I believe I added the Birth Name of Karl Marx, which was Moses Mordecai Levi to that page. I do not see the problem with it. Jimmyy68 (talk) 13:52, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is you did not provide a citation from a reliable source through which the information could be verified, quite possibly because there is no such source. The "fact" you added is a meme spread by right-wing anti-semites who, like Hitler and the Nazis, wish to spread the idea that Communism is a Jewish conspiracy - therefore, Marx must have been a Jew and had a Jewish name which was changed to hide his true nature. In fact, Marx's grandfather was a rabbi, but his father converted to Christianity, so Marx was ethnically Jewish, but not religiously so -- as far as we know, he never practiced Judaism. Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:59, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The source you cited in an edit summary -- eeever.com -- does not appear to be a reliable source. Please read WP:RS for a explanation of what a reliable source is per Wikipedia policy. Beyond My Ken (talk) 01:03, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I do not identify as a Nazi. Heck, I even consider myself an Economic Socialist that’s also a Cultural Left-Wing Nationalist. I even like Marx. Anyhow, I am not sure how to add sources to articles, I’m still a begginer in Wikipedia. Jimmyy68 (talk) 06:18, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I’ll check that out. Jimmyy68 (talk) 06:22, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Angelic Yields

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Angelic Yields requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ♟♙ (talk) 21:18, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Steven Anderson (pastor). Elizium23 (talk) 15:33, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Misuse of minor-edit marker

Hi Jimmyy68! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at GypsyCrusader that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Grorp (talk) 01:04, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings sir! I understand the mistakes that I made. I affirm that I will not misuse the minor edit marker in the future. Thanks for letting me know of my mistake! Jimmyy68 (talk) 03:34, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.

Yamla (talk) 21:19, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proof or it didn't happen. Jimmyy68 (talk) 21:23, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There has been no investigations opened up or probable cause, so I don't think you have the right to block me. Jimmyy68 (talk) 21:27, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And yet, here you are, blocked. Go figure. Beyond My Ken (talk) 01:57, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What's your point? Also, who even are you? Jimmyy68 (talk) 06:34, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]