User talk:Jimmyb10

Free speech and the Fancy Bear article talk page

Regarding this [1], the conspiracy theory that Alperovitch might have deliberately falsified a hack on the DNC at the request of the Democrats is not acceptable for talk pages if it's sourced to CounterPunch. This is true whether you state it outright or whether you merely imply it, as you did here. That kind of opinion is forbidden without reliable sourcing. CounterPunch itself is not reliable for anything but the opinions of authors published there, not for statements of fact.

I just noticed that in your edit summary you claim "This page & my comment have nothing to do with BLP", that is incorrect. BLP applies to every page in Wikipedia, including talk pages [2]. Geogene (talk) 02:41, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons. Thank you. Geogene (talk) 12:52, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from using talk pages for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article; not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. Geogene (talk) 12:52, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]