User talk:JimboLimbo

License tagging for File:John Loudon on Senate Floor.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:John Loudon on Senate Floor.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:05, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

COI noticeboard

You are being discussed here: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#John_William_Loudon Snooganssnoogans (talk) 01:44, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you have an association with John William Loudon, you need to declare it. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 01:44, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Britishfinance, here's another user, who is obviously a COI account, and who is sucking up multiple editors' energy and time, yet nothing is done about it. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 16:51, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to John William Loudon, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Eyer ^contact 03:01, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at John William Loudon, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Eyer ^contact 16:46, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at John William Loudon. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 21:46, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at John William Loudon, you may be blocked from editing. BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 19:53, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at John William Loudon. BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 12:11, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]