User talk:JimWHall

August 28 2012 at 2:29

Hello, Welcome to Wikipedia. Just want to say that I reverted your edit to Daniel Dennett. What is your cite for your change? Geraldshields11 (talk) 02:29, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Mr. Hall, I changed the edit based on the lack of cite and the change was not neutral. See WP:NPOV. Cheers. Geraldshields11 (talk) 03:07, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

Hello, I'm Mr. Vernon. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Daniel Dennett seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Mr. Vernon (talk) 02:56, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Curious

Since I just noticed you on LGR's page and I had to look at your contribution history including your talk page. When did someone invite you to the WikiProject Conservatism and who? ViriiK (talk) 03:00, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Little green rosetta (talk • contribs) 03:01, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 03:06, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Geraldshields11 (talk) 03:27, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My observation

Per the IRC logs of this user claiming to have "received" orders from Lionelt, I seriously doubt that JimWHall is getting any orders from Lionelt. After a constant AN debate between Viriditas and myself regarding the dubious IRC logs from SkepticAnonymous, I have to reasonably conclude that JimWHall is User:SkepticAnonymous aka User:76.31.236.81 aka User:98.195.86.32. SkepticAnonymous apparently embellished an IRC log of discussions between an administrator (Arthur Rubin), Lionelt, and other members of WikiProject Conservatism. If you look at JimWHall's page, he recieved no invites from ANYONE to WikiProject Conservatism and yet he added himself to the list of users claiming he was invited (by an unnamed person). ViriiK (talk) 03:27, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JimWHall for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Mr. Vernon (talk) 03:43, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]