User talk:JimJamJoom

September 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Tom Bates, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Tom Bates was changed by JimJamJoom (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.859774 on 2011-09-11T19:49:13+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:49, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sam Adams (Oregon politician) with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 19:50, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at David Cicilline, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: David Cicilline was changed by JimJamJoom (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.972013 on 2011-09-12T00:59:26+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:59, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Jim Gray (Kentucky politician). —Darkwind (talk) 01:06, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Eagles 24/7 (C) 01:07, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JimJamJoom (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am a serious editor who has been nominated for administrator. This block is ridiculous.

Decline reason:

Your edits do not show that you take this seriously. either way (talk) 01:14, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JimJamJoom (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am serious about becoming an administrator. Now please unblock me.

Decline reason:

Your edits were entirely blatant BLP vandalism, and your request for adminship has already been declined and deleted. If you wish to be unblocked, please address the substance of the block: your vandalism. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 01:24, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

To the admins who read this

Please remove this user's talk page access as he is obviously abusing it --ChristianandJericho 01:44, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for being a vandalism only account. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. Your ability to edit this talk page has also been revoked. If you would like to be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact the unblock mailing list at unblock-en-llists.wikimedia.org. -- DQ (t) (e) 02:59, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]