User talk:Jim.Callahan,Orlando

Welcome!

Hello, Jim.Callahan,Orlando, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! -Icewedge 18:13, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Main article, etc.

Dear Jim: I could see why you didn't want all that stuff on your talk page, but I would prefer to communicate through Wikipedia. I am the chair of an upcoming major conference, and I am getting more e-mail than I can keep organized right now.

I am sorry to say that I don't know anything useful about "Main article" The best place to ask is the Tea House. This is staffed by people who like to give advice and are experienced editors. I'm fairly new, myself, still learning the ins and outs, and I ask questions there regularly. There is no need to be embarrassed about it - Wikipedia is quite complex and not always logical, and even editors who have been doing it for years come across new quirks.

I think that the article you are making will be better for the fact that the information is being explained to you. You seem to be getting good advice, which mainly seems to be keep it simple. Most Wikipedia readers are just regular people, and an article doesn't need a lot of technical detail, just an explanation of what the subject is in clear language. The more detail you put in the harder it is to get the article accepted, because its harder to get everything properly references.

By the way, you mention quoting from another Wikipedia article. Remember that most articles are a conglomeration of many people's work. There is no one person to quote. Also, you shouldn't use Wikipedia to source itself. You can refer to other article by linking to it with the square brackets, and you can add the other article in a "See also" list, or you could say "For more information about _____ see the article Blablabla". Most of this is my own opinion, but it is Wikipedia policy that reviewers don't count other Wikipedia articles when they are checking for sufficient references.

Any way, try the Teahouse for your technical questions. Good luck. —Anne Delong (talk) 04:58, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Stan Modeling Language.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! TheOneSean | Talk to me 12:04, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Stan Modeling Language concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Stan Modeling Language, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:10, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Stan Modeling Language

Hello Jim.Callahan,Orlando. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Stan Modeling Language".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Stan Modeling Language}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 06:01, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Stan Modeling Language concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Stan Modeling Language, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Stan Modeling Language concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Stan Modeling Language, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:59, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Stan Modeling Language

Hello Jim.Callahan,Orlando. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Stan Modeling Language".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Stan Modeling Language}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 22:01, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Stan Modeling Language concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Stan Modeling Language, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Stan Modeling Language

Hello, Jim.Callahan,Orlando. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Stan Modeling Language".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 17:31, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to your email

Hello, thanks for your email. You are encouraged to work on Stan (software) to improve it, rather than your Draft article. There is no deadline here, so you can work on it whenever you have time. JMHamo (talk) 22:32, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to keep my draft as a summary of my research and potentially cut and paste pieces of it into the official Wikipedia article on Stan.

The additional time has given me more perspective on my own writing (I cringed at some my own stylistic elements). Jim.Callahan,Orlando (talk) 23:19, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Jim.Callahan,Orlando: I have moved your work to your User space here User:Jim.Callahan,Orlando/Stan Modeling Language, which you can use to improve Stan (software) JMHamo (talk) 23:27, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: User:Jim.Callahan,Orlando/Stan Modeling Language has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Jim.Callahan,Orlando/Stan Modeling Language. Thanks! JMHamo (talk) 00:04, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jim.Callahan,Orlando. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]