Jump to content

User talk:Jhtraining

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jhtraining, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Jhtraining! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:35, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Amos Seaman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Atlantic306 (talk) 19:31, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

[edit]

Should we have an article on Charles "Tiny" Hermann ? Yes. Should we have what you submitted as an article on Tiny Hermann? No: most of what you submitted was copied word-for-word, or almost, from the NS Hall of Fame's entry on him. That's not allowed. I've deleted the article, because it would need so much reworking that it's more efficient to start over (and I'd need to eliminate the copyrighted material from the article history anyway).

Feel free to rewrite the article, but say it in your own words.

The sources you used were:

(maybe also try http://ottawasporthalloffame.ca/inductees/charles-tiny-bismark-hermann/ )

Good luck: I look forward to reading your work. DS (talk) 15:23, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I moved the article you created in mainspace to draft, so you can incubate it there and AfC it when it's ready for main. Sungodtemple (talk) 14:33, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:William Croscomb

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Jhtraining. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:William Croscomb, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:10, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Michael Francklin. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 21:46, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

[edit]

Copyright problem icon Your edit to William Colsell King has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. JJPMaster (she/they) 21:19, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

William Colsell King moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to William Colsell King. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and relies heavily on Find a Grave which is not a reliable source, with possible copyright violations. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Cielquiparle (talk) 19:40, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of William Colsell King

[edit]

Hello Jhtraining,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged William Colsell King for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 13:59, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]