User talk:Jesslovesthetigers

June 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page 9 (2009 film) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Stainedglasscurtain (talk) 04:26, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.--The Legendary Sky Attacker 07:17, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. --The Legendary Sky Attacker 08:45, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to User:Sky Attacker. MSMStudent (talk) 08:48, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. --Bongwarrior (talk) 08:50, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

{{unblock|sorry, I understand what I did was wrong, I really regret it. I was mucking around with a friend, but now I feel stupid. I really want to help edit pages about tennis/animals as they are a passion. I understand if you decline, but please consider.}}

Note to reviewing admin: This user may be a sockpuppeteer:

User talk:Jesslovespirates, User talk:Jessloveszyou, User talk:Jesslovesmeganandpie, User talk:Jesslovesnick, User talk:Jesslovesdoug and many others.--The Legendary Sky Attacker 02:07, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think any of those accounts are related to this one. I didn't notice any similarities in their contribs, and it's probably just a coincidence that they all happen to start with "jessloves"; if you start plugging in various name + "loves" combinations here, you'll see that some of them get quite a few hits. If this user still wants to be unblocked, I wouldn't have any objections. --Bongwarrior (talk) 06:27, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

I'll give you the benefit of the doubt since Bongwarrior seems ok with it. Please keep an eye on your actions from here out.

Request handled by: Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 04:17, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

August 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to 9 (2009 film), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: 9 (2009 film) was changed by Jesslovesthetigers (u) (t) score equals -13675 on 2009-08-05T23:57:42+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 23:57, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page 9 (2009 film). Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Tiderolls 00:02, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]