User talk:Jessiepgoldberg

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Jessiepgoldberg. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 23:02, 31 March 2015 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

March 2016

Hello, I'm DatGuy. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Karma (WISP) with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 17:15, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Karma (WISP), you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. --David Biddulph (talk) 17:45, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... Hello - I am trying to update the page with accurate information. There has been controversy due to the company's product delay and change of service but allegations of a scam is inaccurate. The company provided full refunds to customers. What is the best way to update this without it being removed? Jessiepgoldberg (talk) 17:51, 1 March 2016 (UTC)Jessie[reply]

The way to handle content disputes is described at WP:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. If your edit has been reverted, you should discuss it on the article talk page, and try to reach WP:Consensus with other users. If you cannot reach consensus, there are WP:Dispute resolution procedures.

It is important to cite reliable sources for your changes - see WP:Verifiability.

If you are connected with the company, you should read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and the Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. In that case you should preferably not edit the article directly, but propose changes on the talk page. Also note that you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use ("Paid contributions without disclosure" under section 4) to disclose your interest in any edits where you have a COI. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 20:25, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. Elaenia (talk) 03:49, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]