User talk:JessicaSPhillips

June 2016

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Harry Handelsman, from its old location at User:JessicaSPhillips/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. /wiae /tlk 01:30, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Harry Handelsman (June 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Delta13C was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

In addition to a need for more sources to verify notability, the article needs to read more like a biography in the context of his profile. Right now, the article reads like a promotional blurb.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Harry Handelsman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Delta13C (talk) 18:55, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! JessicaSPhillips, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Delta13C (talk) 18:55, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

JessicaSPhillips (talk) 16:23, 6 September 2017 (UTC)The facts relating to Harry's personal life are not accurate and the information in the referenced article cites incorrect information about his relationships and Sarah Featherstone working on his home, therefore he would like it removed because he feels it is inappropriate to have incorrect information relating to his personal life online. Please could you clarify how the section on his personal life can be removed or updated to correctly state only that he lives in Bayswater, London?JessicaSPhillips (talk) 16:23, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Harry Handelsman (March 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The specific concern is the sources simply being business announcements, notices or similar and notability cannot be inherited from others; add all additional major independent about him specifically.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Harry Handelsman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 20:04, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Harry Handelsman (April 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Yashovardhan Dhanania was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Harry Handelsman instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Harry Handelsman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Yashovardhan (talk) 16:33, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Harry Handelsman

Bearing in mind your paid editor declaration on your userpage, please do NOT edit Harry Handelsman directly, especially the unexplained removal of cited content. Instead, you should make suggested changes on the article talkpage. Edwardx (talk) 12:50, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

JessicaSPhillips (talk) 16:22, 6 September 2017 (UTC)The facts relating to Harry's personal life are not accurate and the information in the referenced article cites incorrect information therefore he would like it removed because he feels it is inappropriate to have incorrect information relating to his personal life online. Please could you clarify how the section on his personal can be removed or updated to correctly state only that he lives in Bayswater, London?JessicaSPhillips (talk) 16:22, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

We have to update articles in line with what is reported in reliable sources. Please find the appropriate sources and make cited suggestions at Talk:Harry Handelsman, which is where we should be discussing this, not here! Edwardx (talk) 23:54, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There are no recent articles online stating the correct information and all the existing articles show out of date information relating to his relationships etc. He does not wish to have this information published online!

Draft:Harry Handelsman concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Harry Handelsman, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your note. I am not sure how to edit but can you advise me how I can change Harry Handelsman's DOB as it's currently incorrect. His DOB is 17th September 1949, not 19th September.

Thanks

Proposed deletion of Manhattan Loft Corporation

The article Manhattan Loft Corporation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

basically an advertisement for the company

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 21:57, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Harry Handelsman

Hello, JessicaSPhillips. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Harry Handelsman".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 02:38, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Harry Handelsman

Your userpage state, "My name is Jessica Phillips, I work with Harry Handelsman at Manhattan Loft Corporation and I therefore have a conflict of interest regarding this subject." In accordance with WP:COI, please do not edit the article directly, and remove well-cited content. I have just reverted your content removal. Only make suggestions on the article talkpage. Thank you. Edwardx (talk) 10:10, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]