User talk:Jessdro

Welcome!

Hello, Jessdro, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Natalie 23:22, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits to Ashland High School (Massachusetts)

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Jessdro! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule facebook\.com\/.+, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 02:45, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Odor (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 02:18, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Odor. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing – Gurch 02:18, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations!

Because of the edits you made today, you've won yourself a permanent vacation from Wikipedia! Contributing to articles can be very stressful and time-consuming, and it's just too much for some people to handle. So I've set you free! Take a nap in a hammock, walk on the beach, fly a kite, or build a tree fort. If hang gliding or motorcycle racing is more your speed, you can do that, too! You can do whatever you like, as long as you're not editing Wikipedia. Hooray for you! Kafziel ^Talk 13:09, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vacation

That was very considerate of him, wasn't it? --Juansidious 01:23, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Block Appeal

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jessdro (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been a dedicated reader of Wikipedia for quite a while. Sometime during this year will mark the second anniversary of when I first started to utilize the vast pool of knowledge that this site has to offer. However, it wasn't until a few months ago that I had any intention whatsoever to edit "the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit".

I had been looking through various articles and was always greatly aggravated when there was an article lacking a visual to contribute to the content. I had decided that I could remedy this problem by supplying pictures of my own. Despite being entirely unsure of how to edit an article, I promptly created an account with the username "Jessdro", a portmanteau of my first and last names.

To my disappointment, I soon realized that I didn't know how to add a picture to a page. I referred to the uploading images section of the help page, which as ironic as it may sound, didn't help me at all. The reason for this was that I didn't understand the instructions and only looked for a brief moment. I soon dropped this idea but remained logged in to the site because I enjoyed feeling like I was part of the great site that Wikipedia is. I had come down to only adding minor edits, and even these were taken as vandalism and changed back to what they had been previously. Just when I was finally preparing to become a productive member of Wikipedia, I found out much to my chagrin that I had been blocked from editing it. The reason: nothing but vandalism from this account. This didn't make much sense to me since I only made one or two edits and they were most certainly not vandalism.

I was deeply perplexed by this for a while but then I thought to look at the link along the top entitled "my contributions" in bold. To my confusion and surprise there were several edits that I had nothing to do with. Among the included were edits to the film Reign Over Me, Odor, the town of Ashland, Massachusetts, and the name Christopher. Although I am not entirely sure how these edits came to be, I have come to the assumption that it was one of my friends using my computer without my knowledge and testing to see if Wikipedia really can be edited.

Since the duration of my block has been set to indefinite, I fear that I may not be able to edit articles again. I have come to appeal for the removal of it because I think that I can add valuable information to the site and be responsible with my account to prevent incidents of vandalism from happening in the future. Thank you for reading, and please consider.
--Jessdro 01:58, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This request for unblocking has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
- If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas.
Click edit this page on that article and scroll down past the message informing you of your block.
Copy the source of that article and paste it to the bottom of your talk page under a new top-level heading (like this: = [[Article title]] =) and save the page before you improve it.
Propose some significant and well researched improvements to your article by editing your personal copy of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
- If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{helpme|your question here}}" to your talk page. Thank you. -- Netsnipe ► 07:47, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You have many contributions that are clearly vandalism, and ultimately you are responsible for edits made on your account. I am contacting the blocking admin to discus reducing the duration of your block. In the mean time, you might want to consider changing your password to something more secure. --Selket ^Talk 05:29, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You claim that those vandalism edits had nothing to do with you. I'm skeptical about that, since it went on for more than a month. But if you can point out just three helpful edits in all your contributions, I will unblock you. Kafziel ^Talk 11:56, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I completely understand how you could be skeptical about this, but as I said earlier, it wasn't me causing vandalism on the site. My belief is that it was done by someone using my account as some sort of joke. As you may know, when a user first logs on to the site, there is the option to check a box labeled 'remember me'. Of course I decided to check this box so that I wouldn't have to deal with the tedious task of logging in every time I came on here. This proved to be a poor decision on my part since people were able to violate the rules of Wikipedia while using my username. I promise that I will be more secure with this account in the future.
As for helpful edits, I honestly haven't made very many. The reason for this is that whenever I attempted to make an edit it was swiftly removed. One that I made was regarding some students' opinions on the architectural design of Ashland High School (Massachusetts) [1] wherein I referenced this facebook link . This was removed shortly by a bot called Shadowbot explaining to me that facebook links are not allowed. I didn't realize this periviously, but I am sorry for my error and was only trying to add some different opinions of students to show that there is some criticisms of the school.
The other edit I tried to add was to the plot of the movie The Specials (film) [2]. I tried to change part where 'Cosgrove' Toys is mentioned. In the film, there is never any mention of this toy company but instead, there is a fictional 'Kosgro' Toy company. This information can also be backed up by a website called the Internet Movie Database.
And as for a third edit, I can't honestly say that I contributed one. Had I not been blocked without warning I could have possibly gone on to add much better edits to the site, as I was planning to do before I was blocked from editing. Just a short time ago, however, I was going over my contributions where I looked at nearly all of the differences for the pages I had edited and noticed something I had been mistaken about before. I had believed that the edit to the page Reign Over Me was adding a vulgar statement to the Tagline section, but in reality the edit was removing it [3]. I didn't directly do this but considering that it was on this username that would make three helpful edits from this account.

To sum it up the edits were:

1
2
3

Overall, I would greatly appreciate it if you would kindly unblock me.

Jessdro 21:00, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Y	Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): I'm willing to give you another chance. Please don't make me regret it. Request handled by: Kafziel ^Talk 02:24, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hello. --Juansidious 20:35, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

School

My school situation is somewhat complex, and I would rather not delve into it. Look for a platinum blonde. --Juansidious 01:03, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nah. I think the one I'm talking about is from Long Beach, but now may be residing in Provo, Utah. --Juansidious 21:28, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Where did you think I was? --Juansidious 23:46, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a copacetic heretic my style's magnetic you want my gospels? You best get Vedic --Juansidious 01:16, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So what's new in the 'shland? --Juansidious 00:45, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know. --Juansidious 20:46, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Somewhere in the middle of nowhere. --Juansidious 01:06, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The computer of the place that I'm at. --Juansidious 22:00, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

C&C 3 is dope. --Juansidious 02:04, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Check out "." --Juansidious 02:05, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cuz I got a hella fat crush on her. --Juansidious 01:02, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello? --Juansidious 22:31, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

sup --Juansidious 22:18, 15 September 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Juansidious (talk • contribs)

This is such a larry. --Juansidious 22:33, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's like lame, gay, whatever. --Juansidious 01:02, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Residential treatment center --Juansidious 01:04, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nah --Juansidious 01:06, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do it about the lack of children's legal rights in Utah. --Juansidious 01:12, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not necessarily. --Juansidious 01:21, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ESTOY CONFUNDIDO --Juansidious 01:27, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why am I a liar? --Juansidious 01:30, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am not useless.
You need to do some more constructive edits.

--Juansidious 01:28, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I got the Arcade Fire page protected. --Juansidious 01:01, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wanna start a fantasy football thing? PLEASE --Juansidious 01:33, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Some asshole managed to somehow take ownership of Cook Luck's Clan while I was... away. --Juansidious 02:28, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Let's say I were, purely hypothetically, to tell you. You could tell NO ONE. Not your mom, not your dad, not anyone at school, no one. Could you handle that, especially with the repercussion of telling being that I would never tell you anything secret again? --Juansidious 01:07, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[4] This is like seriously TELL NO ONE. TELL NO FRIENDS, RELATIVES, ANYONE. NO JOKE.--Juansidious 01:04, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fantastic. --Juansidious 01:02, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a brief summary of every other episode of Law & Order: SVU:

Act I: Girl gets violently raped.

Act II: Rape leads SVU to investigate a conspiracy to put anthrax in New Orleans drinking water. Neo Nazi leader is arrested following discovery of YouTube video boasting of the plan.

Act III: YouTube video is enhanced to show background detail that proves the victim was lying and in on the plot. Surprise revelation in the courtroom ends with potato cannon attack on judge. --Juansidious 01:57, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

2NWP

You know I was kidding about the wilderness place, right? I was trying to make up the most ridiculous vacation ever. --Juansidious 01:37, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That’s ok, I can deal without ever talking to you again. --Juansidious 01:22, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Check out Immortal Technique [5] and Andre Nickatina, some dope rappers. --Juansidious 00:19, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You don't need one, and which rapper are you referring to? --Juansidious 01:20, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

But they both have beats and rhymes! =[ --Juansidious 01:41, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

?

I like Radiohead now. Also Mars Volta. --Juansidious 01:20, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Halloween

I dressed up as Patrick Stump for Halloween. --Juansidious 01:24, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:DSC01929.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:DSC01929.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:06, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Jessetom.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jessetom.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:07, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:DSC01929.JPG

Image:DSC01929.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 09:52, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:DSC01929.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:DSC01929.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:52, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ashlandhigh logo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Ashlandhigh logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 12:12, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Jessetom.jpg

Image:Jessetom.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 08:32, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Jessetom.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jessetom.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:32, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:DSC01929.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:DSC01929.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:35, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

At first I was a cat, but then I was like, this is gay, so I straightened my hair; got eye-shadow, eye-liner, and black painted nails; put on a pair of Dog Pile suicide stretch jeans and my black Chucks; and told people that no one understands me. --Juansidious 02:41, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What? Who? By the way, I got these [6] --Juansidious (talk) 03:31, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, who did he do it with... they're just headphones, though they do come with a beer opener piuch —Preceding unsigned comment added by Juansidious (talk • contribs) 01:09, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Would you have sex with her? --Juansidious (talk) 02:25, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sign on what? If AIM, no. And can you host the image on photobucket or something, cuz facebook's blocked now. --Juansidious (talk) 02:28, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

dang, just upload it to wikipedia --Juansidious (talk) 02:48, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

dude --Juansidious 16:40, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:N1232550099 30045954 8474.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:N1232550099 30045954 8474.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 05:02, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You need to watch Flight of the Conchords. --Juansidious (talk) 03:49, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Check out my addition to the Ashland page:

Nyanza

The Nyanza Color and Chemical Company had a dye-manufacturing plant in Ashland. In 1971, the factory was identified as a hazard when pollution was discovered in the nearby Sudbury River. The site was placed on the Superfund National Priority List in 1982 when heavy metals and organochlorides were discovered in the soil and water near the site. It was also deemed probable that particles of mercuric sulfate were blown into the air. Cleaning up the contaminated site took 20 years and cost residents $55 million. The estates of the Nyanza executives were charged for the cleanup.

In 2006, the Massachusetts State Department of Public Health released a study that found that people who grew up in Ashland between the late 1960s and early 1980s and swam in the waters near Nyanza had a 200-300% higher incidence of cancer than those who weren't exposed to the chemicals.^[1]

--Juansidious (talk) 03:07, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Feb 28 to March 3, foo. --Juansidious (talk) 02:57, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

i'm not sure about the dates, so i'll call you when i'm back home. --Juansidious (talk) 23:32, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

i'm coming home august 19th. --Juansidious (talk) 18:39, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

^ http://www.colorantshistory.org/Nyanza.html

[1] ttp://www.colorantshistory.org/Nyanza.html

[1]