User talk:Jescoromas
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. 98.248.33.198 (talk) 20:23, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Okay, have this pic for now. But as other editors disagree, please go to the talk page of the article and find a solution there. Thanks Gehenna1510 (talk) 18:04, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
October 2020
[edit]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lou Reed. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. freshacconci (✉) 18:35, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Lou Reed, you may be blocked from editing. Doctorhawkes (talk) 08:41, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia, written and edited by users. As a user, I have a perfect right to change the profile picture on the Lou Reed page, in this case, reverting it back to a famous and well-known image of Reed that was already there (before you changed it). Such an edit is in no way "unconstructive" or "disruptive." What is your logic for such a comment? If anything, you're the one being unconstructive and disruptive, by making such a comment and by threatening me with the possibility of being banned from editing on Wikipedia. You don't own Wikipedia, and your word is, by no means, gospel. Perhaps I was a bit glib in my comment about Lou Reed looking "old" in the image that you uploaded; however, I do think the image of Reed as a young man represents his style and legacy more accurately than your choice, and unless you are able to satisfactorily justify your edit, then I will continue to revert it, within Wikipedia's guidelines of acceptable editing.
- Hi! I didn't upload the file and I wasn't the person who introduced it to the page and I definitely don't have any power to "ban" you. I also don't feel very strongly about which pic is used (though I do prefer the older one). BUT, when people disagree on these matters, you need to seek consensus on the talk page. And if the majority disagree with you, you should move on. Doctorhawkes (talk) 00:10, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Lou Reed. freshacconci (✉) 12:17, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Two editors have disagreed with you: you should discuss on the talk page. So you're editing against consensus, and you're edit-warring. Worse, you're also doing it as an IP. I am going to block you for that. Drmies (talk) 22:37, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Just to let you know
[edit]I'm actually not an administrator, and yes, admins do make mistakes from time to time, but there are some admins that can handle this much better than the others. Zangoose&SeviperMan4055 (talk) 20:21, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
October 2020
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 22:38, 16 October 2020 (UTC)ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |