Jump to content

User talk:Jerzy/Archive 6

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1←Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6Archive 7Archive 8

Speedy deletion nomination of International Rescue Committee of the Red Cross

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on International Rescue Committee of the Red Cross requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. – Gilliam (talk) 16:19, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter - February 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.

Administrator changes

NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67
Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
  • Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
  • The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

Arbitration

Obituaries

  • JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.
Discuss this newsletter • Subscribe • Archive

13:38, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – March 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2017).

Administrator changes

Amortias • Deckiller • BU Rob13
Ronnotel • Islander • Chamal N • Isomorphic • Keeper76 • Lord Voldemort • Shereth • Bdesham • Pjacobi

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • A recent query shows that only 16% of administrators on the English Wikipedia have enabled two-factor authentication. If you haven't already enabled it please consider doing so.
  • Cookie blocks should be deployed to the English Wikipedia soon. This will extend the current autoblock system by setting a cookie for each block, which will then autoblock the user after they switch accounts under a new IP.
  • A bot will now automatically place a protection template on protected pages when admins forget to do so.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:14, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Ishaan Tharoor for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ishaan Tharoor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ishaan Tharoor until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SW3 5DL (talk) 22:12, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – April 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2017).

Administrator changes

added TheDJ
removed Xnuala • CJ • Oldelpaso • Berean Hunter • Jimbo Wales • Andrew c • Karanacs • Modemac • Scott

Guideline and policy news

  • Following a discussion on the backlog of unpatrolled files, consensus was found to create a new user right for autopatrolling file uploads. Implementation progress can be tracked on Phabricator.
  • The BLPPROD grandfather clause, which stated that unreferenced biographies of living persons were only eligible for proposed deletion if they were created after March 18, 2010, has been removed following an RfC.
  • An RfC has closed with consensus to allow proposed deletion of files. The implementation process is ongoing.
  • After an unsuccessful proposal to automatically grant IP block exemption, consensus was found to relax the criteria for granting the user right from needing it to wanting it.

Technical news

  • After a recent RfC, moved pages will soon be featured in a queue similar to Special:NewPagesFeed and require patrolling. Moves by administrators, page movers, and autopatrolled editors will be automatically marked as patrolled.
  • Cookie blocks have been deployed. This extends the current autoblock system by setting a cookie for each block, which will then autoblock the user if they switch accounts, even under a new IP.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:54, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – May 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2017).

Administrator changes

added Karanacs • Berean Hunter • GoldenRing • Dlohcierekim
removed Gdr • Tyrenius • JYolkowski • Longhair • Master Thief Garrett • Aaron Brenneman • Laser brain • JzG • Dragons flight

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Miscellaneous

  • Following an RfC, the editing restrictions page is now split into a list of active restrictions and an archive of those that are old or on inactive accounts. Make sure to check both pages if searching for a restriction.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:19, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Atomics (comics), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Trade paperback. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

   My recollection is that my edit summary, or explanation on a relevant talk page, clarified why this particular instance was intended, namely that only the editor whose work i amended can definitively establish which of the two senses of the term they intended. I have an opinion about which sense was more likely to have been intended, but the evidence suggested to me that the content i changed was written before there was a recognition that disambiguation was desirable and that the linking colleague was unlikely to have been aware that ambiguity was involved. I'm glad the bot intervened, since i expect its message may eventually help scare up the evidence needed to better establish which sense should be linked.
--Jerzy•t 22:12, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – June 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2017).

Administrator changes

added Doug Bell • Dennis Brown • Clpo13 • ONUnicorn
removed ThaddeusB • Yandman • Bjarki S • OldakQuill • Shyam • Jondel • Worm That Turned

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:40, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of International Rescue Committee of the Red Cross for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article International Rescue Committee of the Red Cross is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Rescue Committee of the Red Cross until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Widefox; talk 19:25, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Sorry …

I know we are not at all acquainted, but i am very sorry to hear about your heart attack. I hope you’re well on the mend!🤞 Best regards, — SpikeToronto 21:41, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

   @SpikeToronto: Aw, hell, man, "That's Life", and i've gotten a fair share of it, and then some! I'm gonna die, sooner than i'd choose, and so will you.
   And while i respect others' cautiousness and/or politeness (and e.g. your own willingnesses to speak up), time shouldn't be wasted on regrets, let alone on unfounded regrets. [smile].
--Jerzy•t 22:11, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – July 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2017).

Administrator changes

added Happyme22 • Dragons flight
removed Zad68

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Miscellaneous

  • A newly revamped database report can help identify users who may be eligible to be autopatrolled.
  • A potentially compromised account from 2001–2002 attempted to request resysop. Please practice appropriate account security by using a unique password for Wikipedia, and consider enabling two-factor authentication. Currently around 17% of admins have enabled 2FA, up from 16% in February 2017.
  • Did you know: On 29 June 2017, there were 1,261 administrators on the English Wikipedia – the exact number of administrators as there were ten years ago on 29 June 2007. Since that time, the English Wikipedia has grown from 1.85 million articles to over 5.43 million.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:59, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – August 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2017).

Administrator changes

added Anarchyte • GeneralizationsAreBad • Cullen328 (first RfA to reach WP:300)
removed Cprompt • Rockpocket • Rambo's Revenge • Animum • TexasAndroid • Chuck SMITH • MikeLynch • Crazytales • Ad Orientem

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Ransom F. Shoup II for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ransom F. Shoup II is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ransom F. Shoup II (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DrStrauss talk 09:56, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Molly Seavy-Nesper

The article Molly Seavy-Nesper has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. ϢereSpielChequers 18:05, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – September 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2017).

Administrator changes

added Nakon • Scott
removed Sverdrup • Thespian • Elockid • James086 • Ffirehorse • Celestianpower • Boing! said Zebedee

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • You will now get a notification when someone tries to log in to your account and fails. If they try from a device that has logged into your account before, you will be notified after five failed attempts. You can also set in your preferences to get an email when someone logs in to your account from a new device or IP address, which may be encouraged for admins and accounts with sensitive permissions.
  • Syntax highlighting is now available as a beta feature (more info). This may assist administrators and template editors when dealing with intricate syntax of high-risk templates and system messages.
  • In your notification preferences, you can now block specific users from pinging you. This functionality will soon be available for Special:EmailUser as well.

Arbitration

  • Applications for CheckUser and Oversight are being accepted by the Arbitration Committee until September 12. Community discussion of the candidates will begin on September 18.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:35, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Trice (surname)

Hi Jerzy,

I don't understand what your reasons are (see your edit summary here) for changing the surname list to a non-alpha order one. Could you expand on your summary? Also, what is SAE (searches of WP were not helpful)? To my thinking, alpha order is the simplest system for surname pages, both for editing and for usability as a reader, as well as the most widely used system of order. Where would an editor place additional Trice people having articles within this scheme? Thanks very much, Hamamelis (talk) 12:03, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

   I'm ashamed and sorry to have dithered several days toward an exhaustive reply, when you deserved a prompt one.
   ... not least bcz you so succinctly identified your specific questions.
1.   [Reasons] At least primarily, for the sake of the user's efficient use. The Trice WP:List article (being not a Dab, could be any of several other things), yet serves [let us be frank] primarily a disambiguation task or a disambiguation-like task: lists of notable people sharing a surname serve some vanity purposes, but are worth their compilation effort bcz users have seen a surname mentioned, that may be unambiguous in that context to professionals in the relevant field, or (2) remember hearing of the person named, but don't remember what the given name was, and therefore need an aid to
2.   [SAE] Oops, WP:SIA not SAE [which is also an initialism with S followed by 2 vowels]
3.   [Simplicity of alpha order] Yes, simplest for editing, but there are far more users than editors, and for the articles most used, hopefully massively more users than edited whichever article we are discussing. And the editors are clearly much more motivated than the users. So (excuse my frankness) ease of use far outweighs efficiency of editing.
4.   [Popularity of alpha order] You raise a point here. Perhaps every non-alpha list should carry a fine-print link to WP:Efficient and effective use of Wikipedia lists (which each user would have to consult only once, or maybe once for each standard type of list):
* Secondaries in (solar or) star systems from primary outward; satellites of each secondary from secondary outward; eventually our successors would have to deal with artificial satellites of natural satellites; perhaps the fictional satellites of The Void-universe's multiple semi-fictional sun/star systems are list-article worthy
* Events by time or date, earliest/oldest first (since we are so used to [forward] chronological order that we usually imply "forward" when we say "chronological")
* People with a common ancestor or descendant, by generation, and in birth-order under each pair of parents
* Various forms of alphabetical order, as a last resort
* But specifically, what about lists of people sharing a surname.
5.   [Where to add new Trice entries, with the scheme i switched to] The important thing is to recognize what users of such lists want. As noted above, it's not to find a link to the person with a first name they already know; if that were the case they'd do a search in the "Search Wikipedia" box, having typed or cut-and-pasted the surname into the search box (I just typed "Trice" in my WP search box, :....
I've lost the train-of-thot represented above (perhaps bcz of noticing a reverted-in-one-minit vandalism of an edit flowing out of tonight's work related to the Trice Dab and am too tired to recover it at this point. I thank you, if only (which i doubt) for giving me the (overdue) occasion of inventing the clarification technique of adding the comment that is now in the wp:SIA in question, and i owe you a speedy answer to the next question (or complaint) you present me with.
--Jerzy•t 12:04, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
@Hamamelis:
Thanks for your thorough explanation. To clarify, I did mean that I believed (and still do) that, at least as far as disambiguation pages are concerned, it is far easier for most readers, and editors, alike, to have (for the most part) alphabetized lists. I do now, in the main, understand how you've prioritized where things go within the order you've described, and though I fundamentally disagree with you, I'm not here to fight about it. If the order that suits you either endures without much complaint, or popularly takes hold over disambiguation pages, then I will have to admit that you are correct.
There really is no need for an apology to me, I assure you. I take the pause in answering as a sign of a well-thought out response, which I appreciate. Thanks!
Peace and happy editing! Hamamelis (talk) 08:37, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
   @Hamamelis:Well, that and ill-managed obsessive-compulsive disorder. In any case, thank you.   Both approaches have coexisted for a long time; IMO the tendency to confuse Dabs and SIAs contributes to the ... disharmony ... but there too, YMMV. And it's also time for me to let this one "go its own way" -- especially since Proving the Point is a pitfall.
--Jerzy•t 13:41, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Invitation to Admin confidence survey

Hello,

Beginning in September 2017, the Wikimedia Foundation Anti-harassment tool team will be conducting a survey to gauge how well tools, training, and information exists to assist English Wikipedia administrators in recognizing and mitigating things like sockpuppetry, vandalism, and harassment.

The survey should only take 5 minutes, and your individual response will not be made public. This survey will be integral for our team to determine how to better support administrators.

To take the survey sign up here and we will send you a link to the form.

We really appreciate your input!

Please let us know if you wish to opt-out of all massmessage mailings from the Anti-harassment tools team.

For the Anti-harassment tools team, SPoore (WMF), Community Advocate, Community health initiative (talk) 20:56, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Molly Seavy-Nesper for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Molly Seavy-Nesper is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Molly Seavy-Nesper until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 16:16, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – October 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2017).

Administrator changes

added Boing! said Zebedee • Ansh666 • Ad Orientem
removed Tonywalton • AmiDaniel • Silence • BanyanTree • Magioladitis • Vanamonde93 • Mr.Z-man • Jdavidb • Jakec • Ram-Man • Yelyos • Kurt Shaped Box

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

  • Community consultation on the 2017 candidates for CheckUser and Oversight has concluded. The Arbitration Committee will appoint successful candidates by October 11.
  • A request for comment is open regarding the structure, rules, and procedures of the December 2017 Arbitration Committee election, and how to resolve any issues not covered by existing rules.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:23, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Captain Willard for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Captain Willard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Captain Willard until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 03:31, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Mathematical philosophy

On the disambiguation page you created, Mathematical philosophy, all but two of the entries are non-existent pages with questionable notability of the topic, but at the top it says "under construction." I was just wondering if all of those non-existent pages were being constructed, if the disambiguation page was being constructed, or if it was a note that was left at the top that should have been removed and wasn't. Potatornado (talk) 16:24, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

   @Potatornado: Thanks for the heads-up, when i perhaps deserved a sharp rap upside my head for wandering off to other pages. I grow old....
   IMO, it's tricky deciding, and seldom fruitful to hope the original contributors will put their citations where their mentions are, but i'd prefer to see if they (or perhaps more likely, someone willing to back up the same assertion) happen by, once interest has been shown in the possibility.
--Jerzy•t 12:00, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
   And i think i'm definitively done mucking around. Thanks.
--Jerzy•t 13:54, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – November 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2017).

Administrator changes

added Longhair • Megalibrarygirl • TonyBallioni • Vanamonde93
removed Allen3 • Eluchil404 • Arthur Rubin • Bencherlite

Technical news

Arbitration

Obituaries

  • The Wikipedia community has recently learned that Allen3 (William Allen Peckham) passed away on December 30, 2016, the same day as JohnCD. Allen began editing in 2005 and became an administrator that same year.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Fantasy Games Unlimited (DBA)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Fantasy Games Unlimited (DBA) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. My name isnotdave (talk/contribs) 12:46, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Fantasy Games Unlimited (NY)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Fantasy Games Unlimited (NY) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. My name isnotdave (talk/contribs) 16:27, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Note to Non-Native Speakers of English

Years ago, i got stuck in my brain the idea that there's something wrong about modern English singling out the first-person singular pronoun to be spelled with a capital letter. So i spell it without the capital -- except at the beginning of a sentence, or when i'm not the sole author. If you follow my example, native speakers will just figure you're ignorant of the basics.

(I also say the above, and a bit more, on my User page.)

I love this! I thought i was on my own on this issue. I think we get it – the capitalization of “I” – from the Germanic origins of our language. We should have borrowed the way the Latin languages treat personal pronouns when we borrowed so much else from them, post-Norman Conquest. — SpikeToronto 21:21, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
@SpikeToronto: Tnx (assuming i remember how to use this @-facility) for yr comment on my talk page rant abt my own private personal pronoun "i". Yes, clearly Germanic; i understand linguists have decided which of the surviving Frisian dialects is the one what would make us feel most nearly at home.
   Mine was not a horrible theory, but not the correct one IMO. I now believe that the vicissitudes of writing on (at best) mistreated lambskin with a quill pen and ink made from diseased trees, when reading and writing were lit by burning cow fat, created a problem after (in the normal course of gradually shortening heavily used words) ich (pronounced roughly "eekh") started being prounounced ee and thus eventually spelt i (which can look a lot more like a stray mark or period, if the dot doesn't stand out well). Deformed letters "i" are not a serious problem, whenever there's at least one letter present, immediately before or after, to create a context that clearly implies a missing letter. (And even missing initial small-i at the beginning of a multi-letter word, on the other hand, is almost always little trouble in English: few words (in contrast to Latin) begin with i and a second vowel, so what look like the non-spellings "f", "n", "s", "t", offer at worst the ambiguities if/of, an/in/on/no, as/is/us/so, at/it/to, and even among literate fools, few will fail to quickly learn to start out "Welladay, yon blot art more like to be an 'I' or 'i' than any other cipher." And even 3-letter words with their initial i missing or dubious, must barely ever be ambiguous.
   All that being said, it's damn hard to teach an old dog new tricks, and i'm making no effort to break the habit.
--Jerzy•t 11:21, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
@Jerzy: Just as hard to teach an old dog old tricks once the Alzheimer’s sets in. — SpikeToronto 22:15, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Non-breaking hyphen

Hey Jerzy! I noticed your edit to Taxonomy (biology). The code for a non-breaking hyphen is ‑, but more complex cases can be handled with {{nowrap}}. For more information, see WP:Linebreak. Happy editing! —AntiCompositeNumber (Ring me) 20:50, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

  @AntiCompositeNumber: Tnx, knew in my heart that it had to be there; i might be able to remember where, if my steady wiki-talk diet of   didn't interfere with my memory for all the other rogue "pseudo-characters"; i must read non-breaking hyphen, now that having typed it puts me on the road to mastering it, or at least keeping it from disappearing from my awareness. (OMG, the 7-bit ASCII control characters for the Model 35 Teletype or Model 15 Teletype --ah, via Teletype, one quickly finds Teletype Model 33, whose picture feels like Old Home Week -- just flashed into my head, for the first time in decades. "And if it isn't one thing, it's another": I had just sat down to resume the task of introducing myself to User:PrimeHunter.)
Thanks again, --Jerzy•t 14:41, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Since I have been notified I can give another technical detail. nowiki doesn't work on html character entities. I replace & with & to display them: ‑ and  . PrimeHunter (talk) 15:16, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Taxonomy

I read your Taxonomy (biology) edit summary. The article Domain (biology) is a pretty good read. As in all things, you should actually read it before making a judgement. (Sadly, something I have yet to stop reminding myself to do). 50.64.119.38 (talk) 10:43, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Matriculation (sports activity) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Matriculation (sports activity) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matriculation (sports activity) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pontificalibus (talk) 12:07, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jerzy. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – December 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2017).

Administrator changes

added Joe Roe
readded JzG
removed Ericorbit • Perceval • Thingg • Tristanb • Violetriga

Guideline and policy news

  • Following a request for comment, a new section has been added to the username policy which disallows usernames containing emoji, emoticons or otherwise "decorative" usernames, and usernames that use any non-language symbols. Administrators should discuss issues related to these types of usernames before blocking.

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • Over the last few months, several users have reported backlogs that require administrator attention at WP:ANI, with the most common backlogs showing up on WP:SPI, WP:AIV and WP:RFPP. It is requested that all administrators take some time during this month to help clear backlogs wherever possible. It should be noted that AIV reports are not always valid; however, they still need to be cleared, which may include needing to remind users on what qualifies as vandalism.
  • The Wikimedia Foundation Community health initiative is conducting a survey for English Wikipedia contributors on their experience and satisfaction level with Administrator’s Noticeboard/Incidents. This survey will be integral to gathering information about how this noticeboard works (i.e. which problems it deals with well and which problems it struggles with). If you would like to take this survey, please sign up on this page, and a link for the survey will be emailed to you via Special:EmailUser.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:58, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of J. Frank Diggs

The article J. Frank Diggs has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (biographies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 18:35, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jerzy/Archive_6&oldid=1073015377"