User talk:Jerseyman4
|
The article Significantly Viewed Out Of Market Local Stations in the United States has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- original research
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 08:04, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
- Don't know how to contact me!!!! For goodness sake - how did I contact you above? Do you think it might work the other way round? Do you see the word talk just after my user name? But don't bother - continue the discussion at talk:significantly viewed out of market local stations in the United States. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 01:51, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
- And just to make it clear: I withdraw the deletion proposal providing you don't try and put back those useless lists. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 01:56, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
- I am keeping this article. I want to appeal this with someone of a higher authority than you because you are being very unreasonable. You are not from the United States so you do not understand what this all means. Back off my article! - Jerseyman4
- Back off your article? I think you'd better read WP:OWN. Erpert (let's talk about it) 19:18, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Pinckney Academy NC
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Pinckney Academy NC, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Moreover, please add more verifiable sources, not only 3rd party sources. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Erpert (let's talk about it) 17:08, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
- You might want to read WP:SCHOOL. Erpert (let's talk about it) 19:17, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 21
[edit]Hi. When you recently edited Trans Carolina corridor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SC 38 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)