User talk:Jeromekaram

Welcome!

Hello, Jeromekaram, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Profile defenders, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! JetBlast (talk) 21:09, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 03:01, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Profile Defenders for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Profile Defenders is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Profile Defenders until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. (✉→BWilkins←✎) 09:27, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Profile Defenders. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Gtwfan52 (talk) 05:26, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Removing AfD template

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Profile Defenders. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it. Snotbot t • c » 08:54, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Ke4roh. I notice that you removed topically-relevant content from Woodforest National Bank. However, Wikipedia is not censored to remove content that might be considered objectionable. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Wikipedia maintains a neutral point of view, as best as possible. Reporting negative facts about a company is not an attack but it is inclusion of information that may be relevant to readers. There is an entire article Criticism of Microsoft, for example, and many articles have criticism sections. WNB doesn't have such a section as yet because the article is not very big. That doesn't make the information any less relevant to the article. If you firmly believe the information does not belong in the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page. ke4roh (talk) 19:21, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that you have a blatant attack of vandalism on this company is there a reason for this Ke4roh

Talkback

Hello, Jeromekaram. You have new messages at Ke4roh's talk page.
Message added 20:12, 24 May 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

ke4roh (talk) 20:12, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Photon Infotech for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Photon Infotech is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Photon Infotech until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 07:25, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]