Jump to content

User talk:Jerabotto

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

[edit]
Hi Jerabotto! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 15:48, 2 October 2024 (UTC)


Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

[edit]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Apulia First of All (talk) Add sources
9 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C 2020 Apulian regional election (talk) Add sources
5 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C Flaminio Piccoli (talk) Add sources
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Curzio Maltese (talk) Add sources
69 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: FA Union of the Centre (2002) (talk) Add sources
309 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Italian Socialist Party (talk) Add sources
86 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: C 2006 Italian general election (talk) Cleanup
134 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B 2013 Italian general election (talk) Cleanup
12 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Carlo Giovanardi (talk) Cleanup
39 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA Democratic Centre (Italy) (talk) Expand
3 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Olivists (talk) Expand
48 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Italian Communist Party (2016) (talk) Expand
4 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Barbara M. Carey-Shuler (talk) Unencyclopaedic
5 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C College of Agriculture, Bhawanipatna (talk) Unencyclopaedic
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Liu Jia-Yi (talk) Unencyclopaedic
74 Quality: High, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: GA Hafiz Gul Bahadur Group (talk) Merge
347 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: FA Arc welding (talk) Merge
31 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Shared lane marking (talk) Merge
6 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Socialist Rebirth (2015) (talk) Wikify
27 Quality: High, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: GA Criticism of the National Health Service (England) (talk) Wikify
17 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA Assabet River (talk) Wikify
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start CROPPS (talk) Orphan
3 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C André Freire (talk) Orphan
41 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Bageterie Boulevard (talk) Orphan
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Bertinottiani (talk) Stub
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Moderates and Populars (talk) Stub
6 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Arturo Parisi (talk) Stub
12 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Imma Battaglia (talk) Stub
5 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Marco Follini (talk) Stub
10 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Communist Alternative Party (talk) Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:04, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

[edit]
Information icon

Hello Jerabotto. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Jerabotto. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Jerabotto|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Bilby (talk) 11:16, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies for not adding this earlier. I had assumed that you were warned in regard to ORBIS, but it seems that you weren't. I should have checked more carefully. - Bilby (talk) 11:17, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning, and first of all, thank you for your response. Actually, I've been enjoying contributing to Wikipedia for some time now, and just a couple of months ago, I decided to create an account because I was getting the hang of it and seeing that my edits were going well. After making several edits and gaining a better understanding of how the platform works, including the technical aspects, I tried to create the page for ORBIS Production because it is quite well known in my field, and seeing pages like Martha Production, Indiana Production or The Gunther Corporation, ORBIS seemed to fit well with the existing contents. I probably got carried away with enthusiasm, and I apologize for that. I created Mario Orfeo also, and I'm working on Satellite Lovers and Yoni Assia drafts too. I’m sorry if my behavior may have raised any doubts, but no one is paying me for this, nor do I know the people connected to my edits. Jerabotto (talk) 11:38, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, but that does not really work. I don't think that you just randomly decided to to create ORBIS - it is clearly the result of being paid. And this, in turn, raises concerns with all of your edits.
It is possible to edit Wikipedia while being paid. The main thing is that you need to be open about your paid edits and disclose the employer and client, as explained above. If you do that, and clearly state when you are making paid edits to articles (on the talk page or in the edit summaries) it can work. It is never easy, as a lot of people here are opposed to paid editing and that brings extra scuritny, but some editors have been able to make progress. - Bilby (talk) 01:38, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, and thank you again for your responses. If this is your idea, I don't think there's anything I can do to convince you otherwise, so I won’t try any further. I imagine there are countless cases on the platform. However, I’m in a difficult position right now: I can’t understand how I should proceed. Apparently, the only way forward is to be forced to admit—according to your version—that I was paid to create the ORBIS page and to continue suggesting edits to the entry. For the other pages, though, would I be "free". And what if I haven’t been paid? Maybe it would be better for me to start with another account at this point? It's such a pity lose all my works here. Jerabotto (talk) 08:22, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Bilby, just to be clear, I’m not making any more contributions on Wikipedia simply because I’m afraid of unintentionally damaging other pages. I’m still waiting for your feedback. Jerabotto (talk) 08:15, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

  • Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
  • State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
  • Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.
Bilby (talk) 11:31, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am very sorry, in that I was hoping you would give me another option. Unfortunately, that proved not to be the case. - Bilby (talk) 11:32, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]