User talk:Jensen 198

Welcome...

Hello, Jensen 198, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some useful pages to help you get started:

I hope you'll enjoy contributing as much as I do. When posting on discussion pages, please sign your messages. To do this, type four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

You are seeing this because in my patrols for vandalism, I saw you had edited a page. I also noticed that your talk page (this page) had a red link. That meant that the talk page didn't exist yet. I am sorry you can't eat the cookies, but they are still fresh. If you find a way to enjoy them, let me know. Will (Talk - contribs) 07:04, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

0.999...

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the 0.999... page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Huon 10:38, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was about to say the same, based on the same edit, as well as the following diffs:

http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Light_propulsion&diff=prev&oldid=110272614

http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Lunchtime_soccer_at_friends&diff=prev&oldid=110293819

http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=0.999...&diff=prev&oldid=110262921

http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=0.999...&diff=prev&oldid=110284115

http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=0.999...&diff=110296191&oldid=110285415

If you continue, my next step will be to report you for vandalism.--Niels Ø (noe) 10:47, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you disagree with the maths the article talks about, the best place to do so would be the arguments page, which was introduced for just such problems. Concerning your objection: 9 * 0.999... will yield 8.999..., which is equal to 9. If we were to use this converse reasoning as a proof, it would be circular - I need to know that 0.999...=1 in order to obtain 8.999...=9. But that does not invalidate the algebraic proof, where we start with c=0.999... and do calculations until we arrive at c=1 without any circular reasoning. Yours, Huon 10:56, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lunchtime soccer

Please, be cool. Even with all your accusations, it seems to me that your opinions are not preferred by the general Wikipedia community. Think over what the others and I have said about the article. Flame wars are especially unproductive, and often come out with no results. Personal attacks just make the problems worse. I will back down from debate unless you wish to bring the subject up again.

Please take my comments into consideration. Cheers, Sr13 (T|C) ^{Editor review} 04:27, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not to resume the debate, but the reality is, most Wikipedians do have a life and even play sports. We aren't just nerds working with computers everyday- I just want you to know that. Just try to contain your 14-year-old-ness. :) Sr13 (T|C) ^{Editor review} 05:13, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

February 2007

This is your last warning. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lunchtime soccer, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. K.Z ^Talk ^• ^Vandal ^• ^Contrib 04:53, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Do not vandalise other users' Userpages (as you did with mine). If you disagree with something another user is saying, reply to it either at the Talk page of the appropriate article, the AfD discussion in question or on their Talk page.

Additionally, you may wish to read our policies on reliable sources. I don't doubt that your school is very large and otherwise distinguished, but without actual written sources, anything that goes on at it is not notable. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 04:54, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if you've got my Talk page watchlisted, so I'll let you know that I've responded to your comments there. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 06:41, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An Automated Message from HagermanBot

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 05:49, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AfD

Hi there. Please sign your posts by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. It leaves your name, a link to your user page and talk page, as well as the date you left your message. HangermanBot is an automated bot that adds a comment to the end of all unsigned comments, but it sometimes misses a few or is not active. Signing your signature is actually quite important on Wikipedia and if you have any questions what-so-ever, feel free to ask me anytime. =) Mkdw ^talk 17:18, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Adding to Lunchtime Soccer

Lunchtime soccer

Lunchtime soccer at friends school is a fiercly competitve league of playground soccer at the friends school. It consists of two teams. The team with two state players one regional player and; the team consisting of nobody particularly important. Originally teams were decided by trialing different house groups mixed together until we found the perfect mix. That is... Fry and Oats against Penn, Walker, Backhouse and Mott.

Rules:

The rules are that you just play for the fun of it until the bell goes. When the bell goes it gets serious. it becomes golden goal. That means that the team that scores the first goal after the bell finishes ringing wins the game. There are no second chances and even if the game is continued to be played after, it is in the spirit of non competitive fun and there are no possibilties of winning from the after play. The teams play on in the understanding that the official game has been finished already. When a teacher comes and attempts to call off the game: The game has not ended until a player picks up the ball in his hands and walks al the way off the ground. Upon the completion of this task the game has been ended and has been officially drawn. The three sessions (Morning before school starts, Reccess and lunch time) are all included and it is the team who has won the most sessions that day. If the ball is lost in golden goal time then the team of the person who kicked it over has lost that session. If there is less than three sessions in one day than it is still the best of however many games are played. If each team wins one game and that day only has two sessions then the day is a draw. At the end of the week the team who has won the most games wins the week. If you use your hands your a silly fool. On the grass there are no penalties and if you kick it over you have to get it. At the end of the year, the team with the most wins of weeks wins the year. In Year 2006 the Team of Fry & Oats won the year.

Everybody from different schools should feel free to ad information about their unofficial soccer/football lunchtime leagues.

History of Deleted Articles

I was looking at the list of articles you have created that have been deleted and are now red links. I suggest you read Wikipedia:Notability to avoid creating such articles that don't meet these standards and are AfD. Mkdw ^talk 09:22, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Soccer at lunchtime

Please don't recreate articles that have been deleted through AfD. – Steel 23:56, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't there has never been an article on wikipedia called soccer at lunchtime Jensen 198 01:45, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes there has. [1]. You created it. – Steel 01:52, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

no i didn't. i created one called "lunchtime soccer" switch on and pay attention. It's all about the technicalities

Vandalism

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Doubtful Sound. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Pbroks13 06:06, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hobart meetup

Hobart Meetup

Next: TBA

Last: 3 June 2023

Hello! This is a message to inform you of a Wikipedia Hobart meetup which will be held on 10 January. New and experienced editors are welcome! Please check the meetup page for more information.

This message has been sent to members of Category:Wikipedians in Tasmania by Chuq (talk) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:19, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hobart meetup

Hobart Meetup

Next: TBA

Last: 3 June 2023

Hello! This is a message to inform you of a Wikipedia Hobart meetup which will be held on 10 January. New and experienced editors are welcome! Please check the meetup page for more information.

This message has been sent to members of Category:Wikipedians in Hobart by Chuq (talk) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:24, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hobart area articles

Hello, in advance of a possible project in the Hobart area, we're looking to identify and improve a specific range of articles, mainly those associated with locations in the Hobart City Council region. If you'd like to find out more, please join in the discussion at WikiProject Tasmania, or check out the list of articles at QR list. If you'd prefer to not receive these notifications in the future, please let me know.

This message has been sent to members of Category:Wikipedians in Tasmania, Category:Wikipedians in Hobart, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Tasmania participants by Chuq (talk) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:05, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fair Use in Australia discussion

As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:08, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery