User talk:JenniferUS

September 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Institute for China-America Studies, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Nobody (talk) 13:56, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Please advise on how I can correct the misinformation and disinformation that is listed on this page. JenniferUS (talk) 15:26, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot remove sourced information simply by saying its misinformation and disinformation. You need to provide sources to prove it. Nobody (talk) 05:08, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You said "You cannot remove sourced information simply by saying its misinformation and disinformation." I have never removed any sourced information. There are no sources, citations, or external links that prove the line that I corrected "founded and funded by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)". JenniferUS (talk) 13:48, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You removed: The institute was founded in 2014 and receives funding from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People's Republic of China.^[1] It is known for supporting China's territorial claims in the South China Sea and advocacy in the United States for the Chinese Communist Party's claims.^[2]
As you can see. it has two sources. Unless you have reliable sources that show they are wrong, it stays. Also per WP:BRD and WP:3RR stop changing to your preferred version without adressing this first. Nobody (talk) 14:02, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was referring to the first line of the entire page. These two sources you mention in that paragraph are the same as listed in the 'Reactions' portion down below, which had never been removed from the page as a whole as they were kept below in the Reactions section. Furthermore, they are opinion pieces, not factual links proving the statement of the first sentence you mention, and so are in and of themselves not a sufficient source to prove the funding statement. They belong in 'Reactions' but not in the sourcing of funding.

I have made no further adjustments to the page between now and receiving your message, as the initial starting sentence of the page is now not inaccurate. I thank you for your time, I am not interested in wasting anyone's time. JenniferUS (talk) 14:38, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Fish, Isaac Stone (July 7, 2016). "Beijing Establishes a D.C. Think Tank, and No One Notices". Foreign Policy. Archived from the original on 2024-03-27. Retrieved 2024-03-27.
^ "War Games Offer Partial Picture of a Future China-US Clash Over Taiwan". Centre for International Governance Innovation. January 3, 2023. Archived from the original on May 31, 2023. Retrieved March 27, 2024.

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, JenniferUS. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Institute for China-America Studies, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Bbb23 (talk) 14:51, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Hello JenniferUS. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Institute for China-America Studies, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:JenniferUS. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=JenniferUS|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Amigao (talk) 23:24, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[:0-1] Fish, Isaac Stone (July 7, 2016). "Beijing Establishes a D.C. Think Tank, and No One Notices". Foreign Policy. Archived from the original on 2024-03-27. Retrieved 2024-03-27.

[2] "War Games Offer Partial Picture of a Future China-US Clash Over Taiwan". Centre for International Governance Innovation. January 3, 2023. Archived from the original on May 31, 2023. Retrieved March 27, 2024.

[1]

[2]