User talk:Jellypuzzle
Thank you for taking the time to visit my talk page. If you wish to leave me a message, please post it at the bottom of the list as that makes much more sense to me. Please also use headlines when starting new talk topics (click here to do this) and sign your name by using the signature button (scribble next to the crossed out W) or writing ~~~~ . Feel free to write to me about anything. As long as it isn't a personal attack I'll be very happy to recieve it. Many apologies if you are coming here to tell me I have done something wrong, I probably didn't understand or mean to do it. No comments for a long time may have me talking to myself
EP
[edit]Noticed your edit to EP. Just thought I'd let you know that piping and excess wikilinks are not generally done on dabs. Wikipedia:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages) has more info, and I'm happy to answer any questions.--Commander Keane 11:56, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
- It seems to me that if the article title EP (music CD) is confusing then maybe it needs to be changed but I have no idea, music is music to me.--Commander Keane 12:09, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
- (Note to self - I still don't agree with this but it's silly to argue) Jellypuzzle 00:23, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
Shoe Polish
[edit]I'm sure you didn't mean to, but please watch your edits. You added a picture of a penis back to the featured article in your "reversion of vandalism". — The Hooded Man ♃♂ 19:23, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
- (Note to self - That was very silly). Jellypuzzle 00:20, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
- Re: my vandalism "revert" on Shoe polish, I was multitasking (well, attempting to) as the phone rang and clicked the wrong thing. Very dumb. Will be more careful in the future. Thanks for the message, if it wasn't being watched more closely or wasn't so obvious that could have been bad. Jellypuzzle 19:27, 15 December 2005 (UTC) [This reply was originally posted on User talk:HoodedMan and has been relocated in an effort to keep discussions unfragmented.]
- No problem at all! I can certainly understand problems caused by multitasking. ;) Just thought I'd let you know. — The Hooded Man ♃♂ 23:24, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
Firefox userbox
[edit]I've created a text only version of the {{User:The Raven's Apprentice/Userboxes/User Firefox}} template at {{User:Blast san/userboxes/User browser:Firefox text}} and added it to your user page, I hope you don't mind. I've also made a request for said template to be protected so hopefully no one can edit it. — Ian Moody (talk) 14:06, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
Frog Eyes
[edit]Thanks for the help. The album info box was a mess. I meant to fix that the other day but got distracted.
re: This Heat "2006 reissue (!)"
[edit]I got it in the weekly e-mail from Other Music [1]. The existing CDs have been fetching high prices! - Gyrofrog (talk) 16:03, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
Wikics template
[edit]Hi Jellypuzzle! I've just created a new template to indicate English Wikipedia users who also contribute to the Czech Wikipedia.
Feel free to add it to your userboxes if you like it (and if you actually contribute). Happy Easter. Daniel Šebesta (talk • contribs) 22:23, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the template on Talk:The Pirate Bay
[edit]Thank you for the intro template on Talk:The Pirate Bay. Now that I see it, it's obvious. (And I'm aware of the irony that I don't use the recommended ~~~~ myself..)
--magetoo 17:20, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
hello
[edit]iam new to all this but most importantly i say hi!!
Okkkk
[edit]I know this is off ur suject but wut is with Cthulhu? My boyfrend is OBSSESED!
Orphaned fair use image (Image:Buck65.jpg)
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Buck65.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 07:17, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image (Image:Fluxbloglogo.gif)
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Fluxbloglogo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aksibot 19:11, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
Non-free use disputed for Image:Fieryfurnacesgallowsbirdsbark.jpg
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:Fieryfurnacesgallowsbirdsbark.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:23, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
Non-free use disputed for Image:Fieryfurnacesep.jpg
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:Fieryfurnacesep.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:23, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
Non-free use disputed for Image:Fieryfurnacesblueberryboat.jpg
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:Fieryfurnacesblueberryboat.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:23, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Mogwairockaction.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Mogwairockaction.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BigrTex 20:24, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ys cover.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Ys cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:26, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Whatwouldthecommunitythink.jpg)
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Whatwouldthecommunitythink.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:07, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Git (album)
[edit]A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Git (album), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- Does not meet wikipedia guideline for wp:notability
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Raven1977 (talk) 03:11, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
Image:Wikifox.png listed for deletion
[edit]An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Wikifox.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:31, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
Your PROD got deleted so I listed the article at 'Articles for Deletion'[2]. If you want to add your 2 cents there, by all means... SIS 12:20, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you. I was going to go through that process myself eventually. It was a bit harsh just putting the template in. Jellypuzzle | Talk 12:43, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image (File:Drownedinsoundlogo.png)
[edit]If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ZooFari 07:23, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
[edit]Hello Jellypuzzle! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 2 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:
- Eleanor Friedberger - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:55, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Spotifyscreenshot.png
[edit]If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 14:37, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
Nomination of The Independent Scrutineer for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Independent Scrutineer until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 05:29, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Theindependentscrutineer.jpg
[edit]Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:24, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Jimorourkeinsignificance.jpg
[edit]Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Fieryfurnacesrmc.jpg
[edit]Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:36, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Jellypuzzle. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Jellypuzzle. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Yarn and Glue for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yarn and Glue until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Orphaned non-free image File:Yarnandgluenewsom.jpg
[edit]Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:44, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Wildlikechildren.jpg
[edit]Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:56, 27 April 2024 (UTC)