User talk:JeffKramer651

This is JeffKramer651's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

AfC notification: Draft:Ari Frenkel has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ari Frenkel. Thanks! Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 07:31, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is an actor I've seen in multiple significant roles in TV productions I've watched, which is why I was curious as to why he did not have a wikipedia page (especially "I'm A Virgo") I found all of his work to be validated by IMDb and I cited Entertainment Weekly, The Los Angeles Times, and The Hollywood Reporter, which includes a photo of him. This was my first contribution and I'd like to continue to do so, but would like to make sure my work wasn't for nothing. Is there something I'm missing? I seem to find many entertainment professionals with far less media coverage and legitimate film and TV work that have pages. He also seems to be a cast member in the new Jennifer Lawrence movie, but I haven't seen that yet. JeffKramer651 (talk) 01:05, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ari Frenkel (August 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ca was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Patch allows anyone to submit news stories, with unclear amount of editorial oversight. It's probably not reliable. Same goes for BroadwayWorld. A lot of the sources are just passing mentions and does not contribute to notability. That leaves this, a very short review; and [1], a publication of dubious independence(as Frenkel attended Montclair University)

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ari Frenkel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ca ^{talk to me!} 12:05, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JeffKramer651! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ca ^{talk to me!} 12:05, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ari Frenkel (September 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by OlifanofmrTennant were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ari Frenkel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

OLI 06:31, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ari Frenkel

Hello, JeffKramer651. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ari Frenkel, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:09, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]