User talk:Jean-michelplum
- The page, as written by volunteers contributors is full of mistakes, inaccuracies and violate the copyright and advertising rules.
- As an admin (employee) of WorldChessLive, I want to correct and update this page, making it a encyclopedia-like one.
- how to do it without being "reverting" ?
- On the other hand, i am a newbie on Wikipedia so i'm a bit lost
- thanks for helping me out Jean-michelplum 20:53, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
May 2011
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to World Chess Live, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
- Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- The following is the log entry regarding this warning: World Chess Live was changed by Jean-michelplum (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.987527 on 2011-05-31T09:04:47+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:04, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of World Chess Live for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article World Chess Live is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Chess Live until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. SyG (talk) 16:39, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
Repost of Worldchesslive
[edit] A tag has been placed on Worldchesslive requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: 
which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. Bridgeplayer (talk) 18:25, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
- Hi, I note your disappointment that World Chess Live was redirected but in order to achieve recreation reviews or other commentary from reliable sources is needed to meet WP:GNG. The other problem with the new page is that, as a cut and paste from the original article, it loses attribution and breaches our GFDL licence. I should be happy to help you develop the artice so it meets Wikipedia standards. Bridgeplayer (talk) 18:32, 31 August 2011 (UTC)