User talk:Jdlankin

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Jdlankin! I am RepublicanJacobite and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 02:46, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Law & Order episodes

Why are you creating multiple empty articles for L&O episodes? Would it not make more sense to create one article at a time, with all of the necessary information for a stub, to start with, then all of these empty shells which then have to be filled? All of these empty articles meet the criteria for speedy deletion under Db-a3. I appreciate your efforts, please do not misunderstand me, but I think this approach is counter-productive. ---RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 02:50, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Given the speedy delete requests that have been successful, and the ongoing AfD, I would wait about creating any more articles in the main namespace. But, you can create articles, or basic outlines for articles, as subpages of your user page. For example: http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:Jdlankin/In_Vino_Veritas would be a good subpage for the L&O article you created. You can also request that an administrator move the deleted articles to relevant subpages, which would make it easy to recreate them when and if you prove notability. That is an issue currently being debated on the open AfD. You should let your opinions and thoughts be known there. Let me know if I can be of any further assistance. ---RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 23:52, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Drowned and the Saved(Law & Order episode)

A tag has been placed on The Drowned and the Saved(Law & Order episode) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. \ Backslash Forwardslash / (talk) 03:00, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bailout (Law & Order episode)

A tag has been placed on Bailout (Law & Order episode) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Clubmarx (talk) 03:57, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Crimebusters (Law & Order episode)

A tag has been placed on Crimebusters (Law & Order episode) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Shadowjams (talk) 06:57, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of The Drowned and the Saved (Law & Order episode)

I have nominated The Drowned and the Saved (Law & Order episode), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Drowned and the Saved (Law & Order episode). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. \ Backslash Forwardslash / (talk) 08:07, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of In Vino Veritas (Law & Order episode)

A tag has been placed on In Vino Veritas (Law & Order episode) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Cmprince (talk) 14:13, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New Law & Order episode pages

Hi. While I applaud your enthusiasm, I don't think that it is a good idea to be mass creating so many articles on Law & Order episodes. Most of the articles are a one line description of the episode, along with the standard cast plot. It may be a better idea to work on improving the articles in a singular list, as this follows a standard procedure of Wikipedia. See The Simpsons (season 7) for an example; all the information is kept in one location. Once that has been improved, episodes which have enough information are then spun out from that. \ Backslash Forwardslash / (talk) 06:23, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Have a look at List of Law & Order episodes (season 1). The table format is easy to follow, so I hope you'll be able to improve those articles initially. I've been cleaning up and improving the main List of Law & Order episodes pages, and will be heading off to do the other seasons next, so I would appreciate if you could help. :) \ Backslash Forwardslash / (talk) 20:53, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the feedback. I see what you mean by the Simpsons articles. I started by noticing on the List of Law & Order episodes page that even shorter articles had already been created with only the six main cast members and the short summaries. Since these shorter articles had been created and not challenged, I added guest cast to them and then created other articles by following the same pattern. Now that at least some of my additions have been reversed, these articles remain in their originally shorter form. I will add more detail to my future submissions. But I'm not clear as to why these originally skeleton articles were created or remain unchanged.

Jdlankin (talk) 08:46, 20 October 2009 (UTC)jdlankin[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Jdlankin. You have new messages at Atif.t2's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Thank you for the feedback. I see what you mean by the Simpsons articles. I started by noticing on the List of Law & Order episodes page that even shorter articles had already been created with only the six main cast members and the short summaries. Since these shorter articles had been created and not challenged, I added guest cast to them and then created other articles by following the same pattern. Now that at least some of my additions have been reversed, these articles remain in their originally shorter form. I will add more detail to my future submissions. But I'm not clear as to why these originally skeleton articles were created or remain unchanged.

Jdlankin (talk) 16:49, 17 October 2009 (UTC)Jdlankin[reply]

September 2011

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Tommy Douglas worked, and it has been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 23:51, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kenneth D. Taylor, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Victoria College and BA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:48, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Henry Louis Gates, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:13, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Date formats

Hello. I noticed that you have changed some date formats recently in several articles. Please don't change the format of dates where an article has evolved using predominantly one format. As a general rule, the dates should be left in the format they were originally written in, unless there are reasons for changing it based on strong national ties to the topic. It is also important to maintain a consistent format throughout the article. You can find more information at WP:DATEFORMAT. Thanks. – Wdchk (talk) 04:43, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Tom Flanagan (political scientist) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

has to happen (Flanagan 2008:195). |source=Flanagan, 2000. ''First Nations? Second Thoughts'' p.195) |width = 75% |align = center }}
think tanks and to other academics and is perceived as polarizing and divisive (Troy 2012).</ref>).-->

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:13, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to article John Steinbeck

Hi! I noticed you made an edit to John Steinbeck that broke the formatting of the table of Steinbeck's writing. Please, when you make an edit, check the results in the preview, making sure that you have not accidently created problems. Editing tables are not the easiest kind of edit to make; as you can see, if you look at the table after your edit, there may be unintended consequences. I have reverted your edit. If you wish to add information to the table, I suggest that you copy the source code for the table to your sandbox and experiment there before making the edit to the Steinbeck article. — Neonorange (talk) 16:09, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Steinbeck, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Short Stories. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Michael Bear Carson and Suzan Carson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Devil You Know. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent changes to John Steinbeck

Hi! I noticed your recent changes to this article that removed the ignore <X-- --> (X stands in for !) formatting from the ISBN field in the table of Steinbeck's bibliography. This resulted in incorrect formatting of the ISBN. The format should be, for each ISBN (shown here in bold for clarity), ISBN 014018743X (Cup of Gold) or ISBN 9780143039433 (Grapes of Wrath), depending upon whether the ISBN is 10 digits or 13 digits. ISBN, followed by a space, and then the number, are sufficient, as dashes and spaces after the one following ISBN are ignored (a colon breaks the formatting). This article explains further.

If you wish to complete the changes you started, please check to make certain the ISBNs are correct, and then correct the format. And, of course, you should check my explanation against WP:ISBN in case I have misunderstood. — Neonorange (talk) 22:57, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Hello, I'm SNUGGUMS. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Snuggums (talk / edits) 03:16, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bill Graham (promoter), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page City College. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your question at the Help desk

	Hello Jdlankin. Replies have been posted to your question at the Help desk. If the problem is solved, please place {{Resolved\|1=~~~~}} at the top of the section. Thank you!
	Message added on 22:29, 3 February 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{helpdeskreply}} template.

Disambiguation link notification for March 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Scott Smith (author), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MFA. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hamida Djandoubi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page A&E. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jdlankin. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. Please consider submitting to Wikipedia:Requested articles instead. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Jdlankin/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 20:24, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Jdlankin, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 20:24, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jdlankin. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jdlankin. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]