User talk:Jchen1999

Welcome

Hello, Jchen1999, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 02:31, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

If I add details to certain articles such as the list of train/subways, do I also have to add citations that support it too?

Yes. All Wikipedia content should be based on reliable sources that allow our readers to verify the content. For uncontroversial details a primary source such as the subway operator's website may suffice, but if no third-party sources discuss those aspects of the topic, maybe they're not all that important in the first place. Huon (talk) 21:48, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I looked at the station chart and its details on some lists of subway stations on a subway system, but it didn't show any reliable source that supports the details of that chart. Example: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Line_2,_Guangzhou_Metro, https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Line_3,_Guangzhou_Metro. Do you think that these articles needed additional citations? Why or why not?

Verifiability is one of Wikipedia's core content policies. As I said, all Wikipedia content should be verifiable from reliable sources. Articles which do not cite such sources should be improved or, if that turns out impossible, deleted. Since the two articles you pointed out currently do not satisfy the verifiability policy, they need additional citations. Huon (talk) 00:53, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

So I can improve an article and have someone else do the citing. Do you think that's okay?

As long as it's not sock puppetry it's fine. Also, make sure to sign your posts on talk pages with 4 tildes (~). Acalycine^{(talk/contribs)} 07:43, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I created a thread in the talk page of this article https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:Chicago_Transit_Authority. Can you respond to that please? Jchen1999 (talk) 15:41, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done And a comment on the previous request: Cooperating with someone else on adding well-sourced content is fine and well. Adding unsourced content in the vague hope that someone else possibly might add sources to it is something else entirely. Others will gladly help with formatting references, for example - but you should know that the sources exist and be able to provide them on request. Huon (talk) 16:02, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

If I make an article, can other people not see it when I didn't publish it? Jchen1999 (talk) 20:49, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jchen. If you "make" an article, you "publish it" and other people can see it. There isn't any way to "make" an article and not "publish it" unless you save the article information on your computer like in a word document. If you're working on a draft article, AfC, or sandbox you can work on it without worrying about others assessing it too much until it's moved into the main article space. Mkdw ^talk 20:54, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I logged out of my account and typed User:Jchen1999/sandbox and it seemed that other people can see it. How do I make it so other people can't see what I'm doing? Jchen1999 (talk) 21:43, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As Mkdw said above, the only way to prevent others from seeing what you do is not to save it on Wikipedia at all - use a text editor and save it offline. That said, Wikipedia thrives on collaboration, and there isn't really a good reason to hide what you're doing from other editors. Huon (talk) 21:58, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Do you think this picture is good to add to the route map of Algiers Metro? http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/1844/planm1alger.png This picture is found on this website: http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=446108&page=13 Jchen1999 (talk) 22:18, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be careful. That illustration may well meet the threshold of originality, which would make it subject to copyright and its use on Wikipedia a copyright violation. Furthermore, there's no need to use it; we have an elaborate system of templates that's capable of displaying far more complicated routes than that one - see Wikipedia:Route diagram template for details. Huon (talk) 23:25, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Teahous

Hi Jchen1999! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. We hope to see you there!

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, Teahouse

If you have any other questions you may want to ask them here. Mkdw ^talk 20:58, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Chegongmiao Station

added a link pointing to Tai'an Station

Luohu Station

added a link pointing to China Customs

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Fumin Station

added a link pointing to Tai'an Station

Huaqiang North Station

added a link pointing to Tai'an Station

Huaxin Station

added a link pointing to Tai'an Station

Shixia Station

added a link pointing to Tai'an Station

Tianbei Station

added a link pointing to Tai'an Station

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Chaguang Station

added a link pointing to Nanshan District

Longjing Station (Shenzhen)

added a link pointing to Nanshan District

Xili Lake Station

added a link pointing to Nanshan District

Zhuguang Station

added a link pointing to Nanshan District

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

How to fix a disambiguation link in the Template:S-Line

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Hello,

I was creating new articles of Shenzhen Metro stations on Line 7 and noticed that Longjing Station is also one of the stations in Taiwan. I tried adding the link in the Template:S-line leading to the one in Shenzhen, but it kept leading me to the disambiguation page. Anyone know how to fix this? Here is the image below if you're still confused. Thanks!

Article: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Longjing_Station_(Shenzhen)

Thanks for mentioning this. It's actually an issue with the s-line subtemplates themselves. I'll dig into the code and see about fixing it. Primefac (talk) 15:47, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Primefac (talk) 15:52, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shenyun Station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tai'an Station. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jchen1999. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jchen1999. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]