User talk:JcashmanIII
This is JcashmanIII's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Joey Auch (December 19)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Joey Auch and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Joey Auch, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello, JcashmanIII!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tagishsimon (talk) 21:04, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
|
Joey Auch
[edit]Instead of removing the prior review, you might want to try addressing what it says. I realize that the link to BLP1E may be a bit cryptic, but the reviewer is saying that if Auch's entire claim to fame is this one jingle, it may not be enough to establish notability. You can look at the criteria that apply to musical artists and make the case on the draft's talk page for how Auch meets those criteria. Well laid arguments on talk pages can help persuade a reviewer that you've met the burden of proof. Even less good arguments can open up a discussion that will help you and reviewers come to a better understanding of where this draft should go.
And I have to apologize for how long this all takes. The review process is broken if it generally takes 3 months or more to get an article looked at. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 02:47, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Joey Auch (May 19)
[edit]Concern regarding Draft:Joey Auch
[edit]Hello, JcashmanIII. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Joey Auch, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Joey Auch
[edit]Hello, JcashmanIII. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Joey Auch".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:04, 19 November 2021 (UTC)