User talk:Jboygb01
David Allen Zubik
[edit]Hi! Concerning the article about Bishop Zubik will you please take your concerns to the article's talk page.You are violating Wikipedia's NPOV.Thank you-RFD (talk) 19:46, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- Your edits violate WP:BLP, the policy on biographies of living persons, so I undid your edit. Here's what the policy, which is written in stone, says:
- Editors must take particular care adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page. Such material requires a high degree of sensitivity, and must adhere strictly to all applicable laws in the United States and to all of our content policies, especially:
- * Neutral point of view (NPOV)
- * Verifiability
- * No original research
- We must get the article right.[1] Be very firm about the use of high quality references. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons—whether the material is negative, positive, or just questionable—should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion.[2]
- Biographies of living persons must be written conservatively, with regard for the subject's privacy. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a tabloid paper; it is not our job to be sensationalist, or to be the primary vehicle for the spread of titillating claims about people's lives. The possibility of harm to living subjects is one of the important factors to be considered when exercising editorial judgment.
- This policy applies equally to biographies of living persons and to biographical material about living persons on other pages. The burden of evidence for any edit on Wikipedia rests firmly on the shoulders of the person who commits the edit; this is especially true for edits regarding living persons.
- So you need to provide high quality references. Anything less than that has to be undone. Wikipedia founder User:Jimbo Wales has been very clear about this to administrators. Be aware that I need to revert edits like this as many times as necessary. Royalbroil 00:48, 5 February 2009 (UTC)